Head On The Line (HOTL) Thread

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-kbY7CcLfQ

Watch that, the argument that it was made to look worse because Walsh dropped is frankly bullsh!t, his head height would have dropped no more than 10cm from his full height to the height it was at when Sua'ali'i hit him, the bigger issue in the tackle was Sua'ali'i not dropping sufficiently to put a shot on a much smaller man, had Walsh been at full height it would still have hit his chin at the lowest.

Also game awareness, they all know a fullback in that type of play isn't simply running strait up and down, the potential of him twisting, turning or ducking is much greater, be aware of the situation and defend in a way that minimises risk of that happening, the blame 100% falls in Sua'ali'i's court. It's a completely different situation to a forward carrying the ball up where you know he's going to be strait up and down and at the worst maybe slip a little footwork in at the line.

As a bigger man defending out wide on smaller men Sua'ali'i needs to learn to lower his sights to avoid such incidents.

The worlds oldest fossil was discovered in Australia, they named it Rupert Murdoch.

Well if you don't want to get sent off for putting a shoulder through an attackers head it may pay to make an allowance when the guy running at you is 20cm shorter than you.

The worlds oldest fossil was discovered in Australia, they named it Rupert Murdoch.

Afros wrote:

Well if you don't want to get sent off for putting a shoulder through an attackers head it may pay to make an allowance when the guy running at you is 20cm shorter than you.

Much too logical for Carioca to understand.

Most half-backs are small. By Carioca's reasoning, they should run on tiptoe...

Desert War, Rain Lover, Latin Knight, Hay List, Mustard...my turf heroes...

When a good team run out on the field they are all the same size imo , there's No i in team , it's the size of the heart in the dog that counts , referring to your smart aleck cherry picked retort on size of half backs , Nathan Cleary and team mate Brad Schneider are both 6 foot and Mat Burton who plays half or 5/8 is 6'3" , the day I take one skerrick of notice of you I will put my cue in the rack in the NRL thread . 😎😜😡

Rent a Room, please.

jujuno wrote:

I would drop dead with shock if you ever paid credence to my opinion, Carioca.

You are very typical of so many closed-minded men who think they know more than women.

Especially in regards to sport.

Most men do have more sports knowledge than women

You don't think you are typical i hope JJ

You are an "abnormally" Ouch

And The Boys Light Up.... !

oneonesit wrote:

jujuno wrote:

I would drop dead with shock if you ever paid credence to my opinion, Carioca.

You are very typical of so many closed-minded men who think they know more than women.

Especially in regards to sport.

Most men do have more sports knowledge than women

You don't think you are typical i hope JJ

You are an "abnormally" Ouch

No, I'm not. I know plenty of women who can talk sport. And several men whose knowledge is limited to the team they follow...or just the horses they bet on.

Sound familiar?

Desert War, Rain Lover, Latin Knight, Hay List, Mustard...my turf heroes...

You have discovered my secret...I'm not a woman...I'm actually a cyborg...

Desert War, Rain Lover, Latin Knight, Hay List, Mustard...my turf heroes...

MC 41....you have just confused me more than usual

Your post directly above looks as if i made that post Confused

And The Boys Light Up.... !

mc41 wrote:

oneonesit wrote:

[QUOTE=jujuno] I would drop dead with shock if you ever paid credence to my opinion, Carioca.

You are very typical of so many closed-minded men who think they know more than women.

there are 2 billion? women on this planet, should have been cleaned by now 😂

This is the problem discussing anything with you MC 41. You have a habit of cocking up facts. Fortunately for you most who have got to know you on TBV take it into account. We almost need to have a permanent asterisk next to your name with an explanation at the bottom of the page informing new members of same

There were 2 billion women "on this planet" in 1974. Today there is is excess of 4 billion.

And The Boys Light Up.... !

oneonesit wrote:

mc41 wrote:

oneonesit wrote:

[QUOTE=jujuno] I would drop dead with shock if you ever paid credence to my opinion, Carioca.

You are very typical of so many closed-minded men who think they know more than women.

there are 2 billion? women on this planet, should have been cleaned by now 😂

This is the problem discussing anything with you MC 41. You have a habit of cocking up facts. Fortunately for you most who have got to know you on TBV take it into account. We almost need to have a permanent asterisk next to your name with an explanation at the bottom of the page informing new members of same

There were 2 billion women "on this planet" in 1974. Today there is is excess of 4 billion.

2 billion not identifying as women 👍

Happily born a woman....

or developed in the Black Forest of Germany...

Desert War, Rain Lover, Latin Knight, Hay List, Mustard...my turf heroes...