Thoroughbred Village Home Page. Free horse racing tips at Villagebet.com.au. Contact The Mayor by email: Click Here.
Forum Home Forum Home > All Sports - Public Forums > Joffs All Sports Bar
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Snout in the Trough
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


OldGill.com.au

Snout in the Trough

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Message
Baghdad Bob View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 10 Feb 2010
Location: Victoria
Status: Offline
Points: 13981
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Baghdad Bob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Snout in the Trough
    Posted: 19 Jul 2019 at 7:49pm
A ROOKIE Victorian state MP is billing taxpayers thousands of dollars to employ two of her children in her office because she has “trust issues” with staff.
Catherine Cumming, an independent upper house MP, hired her 19-year-old son and her daughter — who is 18 and still at high school — as casual electorate officers.
The Western Metropolitan MP also employs her niece, her “long-time friend” and her friend’s 21-year-old son.
Parliamentary colleagues are stunned at the arrangement, with one MP saying it “does not pass the pub test”.
But she said: “I feel the need to surround myself with people I can trust and who are capable of doing the job.”
Ms Cumming, a mother of five, said last night her children had “absolutely heard it all from the back seat of my car” during her long career as a local councillor.
“Both of my teenage children have been coming in and looking after the office when people are sick as well as learning what it is to be an electorate officer, because I’m learning how to be an MP.”
When her son posted about his new job on Facebook in May, a friend asked: “Nepotism?” He replied: “Oh course.”
Ms Cumming, who dramatically split from Derryn Hinch’s Justice Party after last year’s state election, said she hired an experienced former Liberal staffer to be a senior adviser but that person had since departed.
“Obviously I have a lot of trust issues after what I have for her children to learn how to manage electorate business, adding she had also given casual jobs to a law student and a person who worked for a council.
Federal politicians are specifically banned from hiring their partner, child, parent or sibling to work for them in taxpayer-funded roles.
But similar rules do not exist for state MPs, with fulltime electorate officers paid between $65,999 and $94,731 a year. Casuals receive a 25 per cent loading.
An upper house MP said: “It is widely considered that having family employed under that banner (of an electorate office) is not appropriate … It’s an ethical issue.”
Back to Top
Tlazolteotl View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Location: Elephant Butte
Status: Offline
Points: 38928
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tlazolteotl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Jul 2019 at 8:05pm
"Federal MPs should be allowed to employ their spouses to work in their offices to help keep families together, Barnaby Joyce says."



Manners are of more importance than laws

Edmund Burke
Back to Top
VOYAGER View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 04 Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 19509
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote VOYAGER Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Jul 2019 at 8:38pm
Yeah smells like Sir Humphrey and his chums

All you need is a secretary in you local office, and a secretary in the parliament and that is it.

If you want policy officers, local community officers and media officers or any other person other than the secretaries, then you hire them out of your own pocket.

Oops, I have suddenly found myself in one of Aesops Fables, sorry about that.
Remember, it might take intelligence to be smart , but it takes experience to be wise
Back to Top
Tlazolteotl View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 02 Oct 2012
Location: Elephant Butte
Status: Offline
Points: 38928
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Tlazolteotl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Jul 2019 at 8:49pm
Believe it or not I sympathise with Barnaby and a lot of other Coalition federal pollies who complained about the Abbott ban. If your spouse is qualified to do the job it's a good idea to have them on staff. Otherwise a federal pollie hardly ever sees their partner.
Manners are of more importance than laws

Edmund Burke
Back to Top
Second Chance View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Status: Online
Points: 56833
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Second Chance Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Jul 2019 at 8:53pm
Well Barnaby sees his second partner most every night, but his first mainly on visits to the Children's Court.  Mind you their respective lawyers see plenty of each other.
Back to Top
rusty nails View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 20 Mar 2013
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Points: 14508
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote rusty nails Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Jul 2019 at 9:50pm
Originally posted by Tlazolteotl Tlazolteotl wrote:

Believe it or not I sympathise with Barnaby and a lot of other Coalition federal pollies who complained about the Abbott ban. If your spouse is qualified to do the job it's a good idea to have them on staff. Otherwise a federal pollie hardly ever sees their partner.

51 sitting days in 2016, 64 in 2017.
They get to fly home on the company dime every weekend.
So, I don’t agree.

And for good old Barnaby to use his electoral allowance to pay his rent.....
Less benefits,not more!
Back to Top
Second Chance View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Status: Online
Points: 56833
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Second Chance Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19 Jul 2019 at 9:59pm
Sorry, you're not quite right Rusty.

To be precise, Joyce stays at his mate's house for free in Canberraand then essentially bills the Australian taxpayer for the notional if non-existent rent.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.127 seconds.