Mr Mueller will be busier than a one-armed wallpaper hanger.

The Facebook/Twitter stuff is only one part of the equation. It is about how it was used to specifically target a small number of states, how it was done, who commissioned them, who carried them out, how they knew who to target specifically(if you understand how Facebook works, you understand this) and whether there was political coordination.

Tlazolteotl wrote: Passing Through wrote: Google Search may also come under scrutiny. It is very subtle in it's search bias but a lot of work is being into it's effects on reader's choices Very subtle? Every time I search for something relating to Australian news it puts Murdoch rags in the top 2 at least search results. It is clearly not based on the quality of the journalism, and it's usually behind a paywall anyway so no good to the average searcher even if they were interested. I wish there was an app or something to eliminate all Murdoch from google search results.

There will be a great gnashing of teeth at Brunswick Heads, if Trump escapes the clutches of the indefatigable Mr Mueller.

Was he the fox when serving multiple appointments under both Reagan and GW Bush?

Passing Through wrote: Was he the fox when serving multiple appointments under both Reagan and GW Bush?

He may have been. Maybe not under Bush. Who knows. Sounds like if he was originally wearing a sheep's clothing he had no problems changing skins during the Obama years. Comey too. Two foxes at the hen house. LOL.

All this new information definitely challenges your credibility. When are you going to realize that credibility is never realized by posting BS. Pick your heroes carefully.

Poor Donny is losing it #bigly Mr Mueller is closing in.

Passing Through wrote: Speaking of credibility Shammy, I hope I am not still losing sleep over Trump in 20 years as you are with Bill  Has Sean got anything him yet? He sure is made of Teflon.  Hopefully the RWNJ conspiracy machine gets him soon so you can relax a bit, but then  they lose their incomes and reason for existing. ....but then there is Obama

Still posting BS, I see. Harvey Winestein, Anthony Weiner, Ben Affleck, Bill Clinton, just to name a few, all come up when the sexual predator conversation arises. I guess we can assume with your biased posting that you favor this conduct. Bill is fair game and it's not just me who believes that the Clintons are a favored class. Comey has proven that. If Bill doesn't want to be in the conversation, he can escape it by staying out of politics. As First Lady, had Hillary prevailed, he would do in WH dressing exactly what he did previously in the oval office closet. Just not with Hillary. Bill and Hillary are current news, the last I checked.

Goodness me you have Clintonmania really bad, dont you?

Passing Through wrote: Shammy, didn't Jared sign up Harvey's lawyer yesterday as the Trump/Russia conspiracy investigation deepens?

Was Harvey's lawyer a sexual predator too? More BS from you. Good lawyers represent scum like Harvey all the time. Maybe Jared wants a good lawyer. Harvey is in rehab and no lawyer can help him there.

How about the revelation of a FBI informant ready to tell all about the Russian uranium deal. Bill is still in the news no matter what I think.

Be careful about what you say about General Kelly. Coming from a couch potato who has never served in the military, it sounds petty. You don't want to sound petty and embarrass your nephews, do you?

Passing Through wrote: I think it a shame that you defend Trump's behavior that puts General Kelly in a position he should never be. Trump dragged him into this with his ''ask General Kelly'' whether Obama rang him when hi son was killed. Appalling, as is your defense of him

Once again you are the pot calling the kettle black. I admire the fact that you can find something offensive when for the past 300 pages you have scavenging for filthy evidence that Trump. his family, his advisors, and his supporters are unworthy of a voice in American politics and deplorable. Trump shouldn't have involved Kelly, but your sniping was directed at Kelly. Anyone listening to Kelly at the news briefing indicates he is in full control of the circumstances. Something you are probably incapable of.   Just more BS from you.

Passing Through wrote: max manewer wrote: Hypocrisy writ large. So is interference happening or not?

Historically, USA #1, daylight #2.

Passing Through wrote: max manewer wrote: Hypocrisy writ large. So is interference happening or not?

I dare say it is.

russian interference - a bees di*ck.

usa hypocrisy - stratospheric.

Passing Through wrote: Ms Halley and all of the intelligence agencies say different

Your finding credibility in Ms Haley is a recent occurrence. I don't give a bugger what she or the agencies say, SHOW US THE EVIDENCE. In its entirety.