Rolf Harris arrested again

Precisely what were the allegations against Rolf?

1) That aged 35 years, he had sex with a 16 year old female back in the Swinging 60's and 70's.
He tickled and pinched a couple of backsides of teenage girls.
This incidentally makes him as big a criminal as half the male population of Italy and most of continental Europe.
It was the 1960's, not the repressive big brother decades of the 2000's.
But forget the slap and tickle. the guy could paint. He was an artist unlike most other Anglos.
His work should be treasured not trashed.
I would rather see beautiful art from a man who likes girls, than federation square made from a homosexual.
Im also angry how that call him a pedophile.
My understanding is that most of the girls involved were at least 16 years old.
Charlie Chaplin married a 13 year old girl when he was in his 40's.
I dont see anyone destroying Charlie Chaplins lifes works. Probably because unlike Rolf,,, Chaplin was a Communist,, the world media dont like to attack those people.

And they are confusing Rolf with Jimmy Seville.
They criticised Rolf for telling a 16 year old female that she looked pretty in her bathing clothes.
What a pig??
He dared with Artists eyes to declare that a 16 year old in a bikini is attractive.
The anglo media is sick.
The age of consent in Hungary until it joined the European Union and was forced by England to change, was 13 years.
Rolf was an artist, and by nature as such, was very focused on naked form.

Watch the old episodes of Paul Hogan, Are you being Served, and the Carry On films of the 60's.
It was a different era, and its super unfair to judge him by the morality of this repressive decade.
The 60's and 70's were not the 2010's.
People were more normal and natural.
Did he touch girls, or young women??
To my knowledge, he touched females with breasts.
Had they been 18, they wouldnt have been able to arrest him.

Dont get me wrong, its never cool to force anyone into sex.
But it was the 60's and 70's, and they were all above 15 years of age.
They all had pubic hair, breasts, menstruated, and he was guilty of a bit of slap and tickle.
Im not joking, you could arrest half of Europe on that "crime".

He was no Jimmy Seville- who raped 5 year old boys and dead children in a morgue, and the media to compare Rolf with that, is a sheer insult.
Its a homosexual attack on heterosexual manhood.
England, and Australia, promotes homosexuality, and is turning men into feminine nancy's.

Personally, I think there are levels of sexual impropriety.
Ranging from deranged to  100% acceptable.
Rolf was probably somewhere in between the 2.
But he is no Michael Jackson. No Jimmy Seville.


Michelangelo had sex with young boys, but that doesnt give anyone the right to remove and destroy his incredible artwork.
They are taking away Rolf's honors, medals, trophies, and removing all his artwork, from all around Australia and the UK, but he was not recognised for his personal life, but for his works of art.
His painting of the Queen being easily one of the best portraits I have seen of her.
What he may or may not have done in his personal life is irrelevant.

If we were to remove art based on the personal transgressions of artists, you could pretty much empty every art gallery in the world.

Its so very typical Anglo world, to erase from memory and evidence, that there was once a Rolf Harris.
Its called Whitewash, and the Poms have been doing it for many many years.

In Hungary, there is a Statue Park, where all the Soviet Union era statues have been placed.
They represent a very dark era of Hungarian history, even though those statues represent millions of Hungarian deaths under the Communist repression.
They werent destroyed by the government, instead all placed into one park to show off how ludicrous the era was.
They didnt deny the history.
But for the Protest-ant Anglo, to deny and erase history, is oh so very typically English.
Either robbing or erasing. Forever the Whitewash.

BROOKE wrote: Precisely what were the allegations against Rolf? 1) That aged 35 years, he had sex with a 16 year old female back in the Swinging 60's and 70's. He tickled and pinched a couple of backsides of teenage girls. This incidentally makes him as big a criminal as half the male population of Italy and most of continental Europe. It was the 1960's, not the repressive big brother decades of the 2000's. But forget the slap and tickle. the guy could paint. He was an artist unlike most other Anglos. His work should be treasured not trashed. I would rather see beautiful art from a man who likes girls, than federation square made from a homosexual. Im also angry how that call him a pedophile. My understanding is that most of the girls involved were at least 16 years old. Charlie Chaplin married a 13 year old girl when he was in his 40's. I dont see anyone destroying Charlie Chaplins lifes works. Probably because unlike Rolf,,, Chaplin was a Communist,, the world media dont like to attack those people. And they are confusing Rolf with Jimmy Seville. They criticised Rolf for telling a 16 year old female that she looked pretty in her bathing clothes. What a pig?? He dared with Artists eyes to declare that a 16 year old in a bikini is attractive. The anglo media is sick. The age of consent in Hungary until it joined the European Union and was forced by England to change, was 13 years. Rolf was an artist, and by nature as such, was very focused on naked form. Watch the old episodes of Paul Hogan, Are you being Served, and the Carry On films of the 60's. It was a different era, and its super unfair to judge him by the morality of this repressive decade. The 60's and 70's were not the 2010's. People were more normal and natural. Did he touch girls, or young women?? To my knowledge, he touched females with breasts. Had they been 18, they wouldnt have been able to arrest him. Dont get me wrong, its never cool to force anyone into sex. But it was the 60's and 70's, and they were all above 15 years of age. They all had pubic hair, breasts, menstruated, and he was guilty of a bit of slap and tickle. Im not joking, you could arrest half of Europe on that "crime". He was no Jimmy Seville- who raped 5 year old boys and dead children in a morgue, and the media to compare Rolf with that, is a sheer insult. Its a homosexual attack on heterosexual manhood. England, and Australia, promotes homosexuality, and is turning men into feminine nancy's. Personally, I think there are levels of sexual impropriety. Ranging from deranged to  100% acceptable. Rolf was probably somewhere in between the 2. But he is no Michael Jackson. No Jimmy Seville. Michelangelo had sex with young boys, but that doesnt give anyone the right to remove and destroy his incredible artwork. They are taking away Rolf's honors, medals, trophies, and removing all his artwork, from all around Australia and the UK, but he was not recognised for his personal life, but for his works of art. His painting of the Queen being easily one of the best portraits I have seen of her. What he may or may not have done in his personal life is irrelevant. If we were to remove art based on the personal transgressions of artists, you could pretty much empty every art gallery in the world. Its so very typical Anglo world, to erase from memory and evidence, that there was once a Rolf Harris. Its called Whitewash, and the Poms have been doing it for many many years. In Hungary, there is a Statue Park, where all the Soviet Union era statues have been placed. They represent a very dark era of Hungarian history, even though those statues represent millions of Hungarian deaths under the Communist repression. They werent destroyed by the government, instead all placed into one park to show off how ludicrous the era was. They didnt deny the history. But for the Protest-ant Anglo, to deny and erase history, is oh so very typically English. Either robbing or erasing. Forever the Whitewash.

Who is Jimmy Seville? Some Spanish comedian or something?

His name is Savile 

Edited by Browndog - 02 Jul 2014 at 10:30am

Was it seen as less of a problem in days past, or was less inclined to be listened to?

But forget the slap and tickle. the guy could paint.


could he really?

I am no art expert so I don't know the quality of his work.

there is a difference between painting good likenesses and artistic merit

of course that has nothing to do with the charges as you know.

a stupid contrarian as always Brooke

what if he groped you Brooke for instance, would you get it then.

very blase of you to lessen the seriousness when it isn't you.

I suppose they deserved it because they were Anglos

The point is, a tactile man he may have been, and opportunistic, as he was surrounded by young women, it sounds as though his artistic eye was sensually attracted to young women, but at an age they had curves.
Not 8 year old undeveloped girls.
And he declared that a 16 year old girl, looked gorgeous in a bikini. The media highlighted that.
What on earth for????
Why is that even a crime??
They are turning men into homosexuals.
To my knowledge, Rolf Harris was touchy feely with females who had curves.
And as stated, age 13 and above was the legal age in Hungary before England via the European Union, recently demanded the age be lifted higher.
And Charlie Chaplin married a 13 year old girl, when he was in his 40's.
Wheres the outrage at that?????

Groping people without their consent is a crime regardless of what age they are, Rolf was clearly a lecher who somehow felt his celebrity gave him immunity. The only surprise is his "luck" held for as long as it did.

maccamax wrote: acacia alba wrote: sometimes you go too far Macca.  you dont seem to 'get" the difference between amusing and disgusting . You know something Acacia .    What I said would not compare with some of yours .    Do yourself a favour and only read your own posts .    Stop trying to set standards you don't follow yourself. Tell me what I said so wrong and cure me.     Blow up dolls are renowned for going down.   That's why they cum with a pump u silly old moo.

the part you dont get is the way you speak about the victims .   almost as if you are blaming them because he is a dirty old man . i couldnt give a toss about your chinese girlfriends. you can have a different one every day of the week for all i care.
its as BD says.  back then it was a different world and young women were afraid to speak out , and there were no services to assist them.  there are way too many "coming out of the woodwork ", as you say, for it to be a beat up.

He isn't just a paedophile, he was allegedly notorious for "manhandling" numerous adult women in the media and show business. I can only wonder how it all didn't come crashing down long ago.

I wish I could get groped.
I must be using the wrong after shave.

acacia alba wrote: just join Rolph,s team and no telling what you might get. but HE did the groping,,,,,,if you are on that team thats sad.

Not on the team AA.
   Groping kids just isn't on.     The hardest part to understand is why did it take 70 years for someone to speak up and act.

maccamax wrote:      The hardest part to understand is why did it take 70 years for someone to speak up and act.

It's called the power of celebrity.

Its also the power authoritive figures have over kids. Just look at the Roman Catholic Church and the Salvation Army.

Has a market been drawn up and published betting on just how long he'll get ?

My guess is less than 5 years.

   Someone said "what if he groped Brooke"
That might be the sentence tonight .