Print Page | Close Window

Pauline Hanson

Printed From: Thoroughbred Village
Category: All Sports - Public Forums
Forum Name: Joffs All Sports Bar
Forum Description: Visit the famous All Sports Forum to chat with friends about any sporting topic
URL: https://forum.thoroughbredvillage.com.au/forum_posts.asp?TID=59734
Printed Date: 29 Mar 2024 at 1:20pm
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 12.05 - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Pauline Hanson
Posted By: Tlazolteotl
Subject: Pauline Hanson
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 9:29am
She's an empty vessel. Her advisers may occasionally pour a good idea in but it's entirely up to them. Fairdinkum, Trump is Einstein compared to Hanson- she is not the Australian Trump.

-------------
An honest politician is one who when he is bought will stay bought.

Simon Cameron




Replies:
Posted By: cabosanlucas
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 10:05am
true to form, and her love in with trump...she blamed the media for ON being ignored in WA.

the media have been a friend. she has nothing.

religion, immigration and then what????. .you cant run a country on two largely social platforms.

maybe people have woken up to the fact she votes with liberals about 80% of the time. and doing sweet heart deals with those greedy bullies isnt very popular.


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 10:42am
Climbing into bed with those her supporters say they are moving away from was an enormous own-goal. Using Trumisms and following his thought-farts didn't help either Australians aren't Americans. We have a lot of protections that Americans who are feeling vulnerable dont have. When Hawke/Keating rebuilt our economy they put them in place, and besides the best efforts of the right to tear them down, they are holding strong 

-------------


Posted By: Tlazolteotl
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 11:35am
Imagine if you had to form a Cabinet out of the numbskulls and lunatics Hanson has in her party.


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 11:44am
She's absolutely right on Islam, and she is the only political leader with the balls to say it ... whilst that remains the case, she has my vote, and all of you who are too out of touch to accept the problem will be thanking her later.

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 12:16pm
She will send the joint down the toilet, but as long as no Muslims are going down with you, she will do? LOL

-------------


Posted By: cabosanlucas
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 12:35pm
Originally posted by Dr E Dr E wrote:

She's absolutely right on Islam, and she is the only political leader with the balls to say it ... whilst that remains the case, she has my vote, and all of you who are too out of touch to accept the problem will be thanking her later.


She is right on some parts of islam. but overall...do you really think your lot in life or the nations will be improved with her leadership?


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 1:47pm
Whilst I don't think Pauline is smart enough, and I don't think she has enough intelligent, qualified people around her to lead a marching band ... she does express what is genuinely on people's minds, without fear or favour.

Meanwhile, the two major parties, who allegedly have smart leadership, and who have the best available advisers, are morally corrupted on the important issues and gagged by the vested interest who they are beholding to. That and the fact that they can't upset anyone, due to their 3 year focus on re-election, makes both parties impotent when it comes to issues like the Islamification of Australia.

You can just see the first order of business for a new ALP government - open borders to Muslims only, and a Mosque in every school!

... and if the Liberals fall in again, they will just say "phew, we got away with it again, no need to change anything for 3 years, just keep blaming the ALP and those difficult cross benches, and call out Bullgelati Bill as a soft cock every now and then!"

To see evidence of what inaction will bring, you simply have to look at the European experience, huge areas are now no go zones for infidels, and we already have plenty of those in Sydney and Melbourne ... Punchbowl High is the tip of the iceberg.

So if you are happy for the invasion to continue unabated, then it's easy, just keep doing what we have been doing, ignore or denigrate the "racists and Islamaphobes", don't attempt to push back ... and if at all concerned about our loss of culture, just follow PT's heroic lead ... hold up the white flag and head for the hills!Dead    


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: subastral
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 1:52pm
Originally posted by Dr E Dr E wrote:

Whilst I don't think Pauline is smart enough, and I don't think she has enough intelligent, qualified people around her to lead a marching band ... she does express what is genuinely on people's minds, without fear or favour.

Meanwhile, the two major parties, who allegedly have smart leadership, and who have the best available advisers, are morally corrupted on the important issues and gagged by the vested interest who they are beholding to. That and the fact that they can't upset anyone, due to their 3 year focus on re-election, makes both parties impotent when it comes to issues like the Islamification of Australia.

You can just see the first order of business for a new ALP government - open borders to Muslims only, and a Mosque in every school!

... and if the Liberals fall in again, they will just say "phew, we got away with it again, no need to change anything for 3 years, just keep blaming the ALP and those difficult cross benches, and call out Bullgelati Bill as a soft cock every now and then!"

To see evidence of what inaction will bring, you simply have to look at the European experience, huge areas are now no go zones for infidels, and we already have plenty of those in Sydney and Melbourne ... Punchbowl High is the tip of the iceberg.

So if you are happy for the invasion to continue unabated, then it's easy, just keep doing what we have been doing, ignore or denigrate the "racists and Islamaphobes", don't attempt to push back ... and if at all concerned about our loss of culture, just follow PT's heroic lead ... hold up the white flag and head for the hills!Dead    
 
 
About 5.6 percent of people, Dr......Thumbs Up
Love WA!!!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 2:00pm
The mythical crypto-fascist silent majority 

-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 2:05pm
I just said she had bad advice subbie, who told her it was a good idea to hitch her wagon to a sinking ship?Wacko

I wouldn't be misled by what happens in a little back water like WA - they have less Muslims there than are enrolled at Punchbowl High!

You might recall this though ...

The Essential Poll from 2/8/2016

Ban on Muslim immigration 

Q Would you support or oppose a ban on Muslim immigration to Australia? 

Total support 49% 
Total Opposed 40%

http://www.essentialvision.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Essential-Report_160802_immigration.pdf

So where are you going to hide ... or have you already been online and ordered your prayer mat and quran from "Radicals R' Us" ...?


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: subastral
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 2:11pm
Hmm, an irrelevant poll, or an actual election result........wonder which I will take more seriously.....
Your ship is sinking, Dr.  Hate has had its day.


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 3:29pm
There is only one poll that counts, unless you are a mile in front in the other ones 

-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 5:18pm
Originally posted by subastral subastral wrote:

Hmm, an irrelevant poll, or an actual election result........wonder which I will take more seriously.....
Your ship is sinking, Dr.  Hate has had its day.

Your naivety and out of touch thinking in the face of obvious facts is truly breathtaking ... surely you jest!? ... "an irrelevant poll" ... but that perfectly describes the preordained result of this WA election ... or was it a surprise to you?Wacko

State based issues. They simply hate the guy who'd been there too long and having told them he was quitting anyway, he had already written and practiced his concession speech!

... as much as you and Bullgelati Bill would love for it to be relevant, it was a totally meaningless result in the context of what is happening in the real world. 

Pauline has already admitted the mistake of the preference deal which has ultimately anchored her - and yet her party's vote rose from zero to be over 5% statewide, and <10% in some seats, in spite of the luggage.

When you are ready to step out of Bizarro World, and you want a clue on reality, let me know, and we can go for a wander down the main the street of Greenacre, I can even show you where the Skaf brothers did their best work ... but tat's another story!Wink 


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 5:32pm
Michael Keenan on the ABC coverage before polls close... ''WA is in great shape under the Barnett government''

Michael Keenan after the concession ..'' The McGowan government faces significant difficulties''


-------------


Posted By: Second Chance
Date Posted: 12 Mar 2017 at 5:46pm
There's one thing Pauline does very well, make that hugely well, ie make a personal fortune copping the incrementalised reimbursements that come her way, courtesy of the tax payer.

Within earshot quite some years ago distinctly heard her smirkingly boast just how much money she could bilk from you and I just so long as she enjoyed a sufficient quota.  Even without winning.

Financially plays the Electorate on a break.  And with just two policies.  Simply amazing.  Confused


Posted By: JoH
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 12:31am
Absolutely spot on Second Chance ...  by no measure could she be considered 'intelligent' in a quantifiable sense but she is as street smart as they come and as cunning (and morally doubtful) as a s**thouse rat.
A nasty piece of work that one  Thumbs Down










-------------
suck it up ... Life isn't run at w.f.a. :)


Posted By: jujuno
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 9:56am
Originally posted by JoH JoH wrote:

Absolutely spot on Second Chance ...  by no measure could she be considered 'intelligent' in a quantifiable sense but she is as street smart as they come and as cunning (and morally doubtful) as a s**thouse rat.
A nasty piece of work that one  Thumbs Down









 I'll second that...Clap


-------------
Desert War, Rain Lover, Latin Knight, Hay List, Mustard...my turf heroes...


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 10:53am
The idiots intellectual 

-------------


Posted By: crooked_gambler
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 11:18am


-------------
This space has been intentionally left blank


Posted By: TIGER
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 11:26am
She is not alone when it comes to politics

-------------
EAD


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 11:32am
No, but most of the others don't run on a platform of being anti politics

Her supporters blew that lie out of the water on the weekend


-------------


Posted By: maccamax
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 11:44am
Originally posted by JoH JoH wrote:

Absolutely spot on Second Chance ...  by no measure could she be considered 'intelligent' in a quantifiable sense but she is as street smart as they come and as cunning (and morally doubtful) as a s**thouse rat.
A nasty piece of work that one  Thumbs Down

====    A nasty piece of work that one = Not Nice .
 
 What do you base such a statement on . ?  
Is it a crime to have  an opinion in your territory ...  
 
Hahaha      ( morally doubtful says both of you )


Posted By: Tlazolteotl
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 11:51am
You don't hear many rabble-rousing demagogues with tremulous high voices. I'm amazed that it works for her. Doesn't inspire confidence. Sounds likes she's about to wet her pants.


Posted By: waggamick
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 12:57pm
Hanson entered politics as a member of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/City_of_Ipswich" rel="nofollow - Ipswich City Council in 1994 when she stood for council to oppose the funding of a new library.

can see her roaming the streets of Ipswich breaking windows and burning books...Kristallnacht Queensland style.


-------------
The Dude Abides


Posted By: JudgeHolden
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 6:00pm
Originally posted by Second Chance Second Chance wrote:

There's one thing Pauline does very well, make that hugely well, ie make a personal fortune copping the incrementalised reimbursements that come her way, courtesy of the tax payer.

Within earshot quite some years ago distinctly heard her smirkingly boast just how much money she could bilk from you and I just so long as she enjoyed a sufficient quota.  Even without winning.

Financially plays the Electorate on a break.  And with just two policies.  Simply amazing.  Confused

What's the other one?


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 6:02pm
Ban Muslims and give Qlds GST money to WA, although I think the second one is now off the agenda

-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 6:40pm
Originally posted by Passing Through Passing Through wrote:

No, but most of the others don't run on a platform of being anti politics

Her supporters blew that lie out of the water on the weekend

Which supporters were they PT? ... she had none in WA (hardly an accurate barometer for anything relevant to Australia) a year and a bit ago ... 


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 6:45pm
Originally posted by JudgeHolden JudgeHolden wrote:

Originally posted by Second Chance Second Chance wrote:

There's one thing Pauline does very well, make that hugely well, ie make a personal fortune copping the incrementalised reimbursements that come her way, courtesy of the tax payer.

Within earshot quite some years ago distinctly heard her smirkingly boast just how much money she could bilk from you and I just so long as she enjoyed a sufficient quota.  Even without winning.

Financially plays the Electorate on a break.  And with just two policies.  Simply amazing.  Confused

What's the other one?

If she had one, she would be in front of Bullgelati Bill and Mr Turnbull on aggregate.

Oh, sorry, they do share one policy around turning a blind eye to anything to do with Islam in Bankstown ... don't mention the war!Dead


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Second Chance
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 7:16pm
Hey Doc, you're slipping.

Couple of posts that make no mention of the CFMEU or GLM stuff.  Shocked


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 13 Mar 2017 at 9:14pm
Originally posted by Dr E Dr E wrote:

Originally posted by Passing Through Passing Through wrote:

No, but most of the others don't run on a platform of being anti politics

Her supporters blew that lie out of the water on the weekend

Which supporters were they PT? ... she had none in WA (hardly an accurate barometer for anything relevant to Australia) a year and a bit ago ... 

Well she still has none despite a week long state visit to the most right wing state in the commonwealth from the party leader herself.

Great result for Labor. Despite Truffles bleats to the contrary, there will be no preference deals between Libs and PHONy, not because of Libs, but because Libs are poison to PHONy They will ensure a split right vote and the certainty of a Labor govt 


-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2017 at 12:40am
Originally posted by Passing Through Passing Through wrote:

Originally posted by Dr E Dr E wrote:

Originally posted by Passing Through Passing Through wrote:

No, but most of the others don't run on a platform of being anti politics

Her supporters blew that lie out of the water on the weekend

Which supporters were they PT? ... she had none in WA (hardly an accurate barometer for anything relevant to Australia) a year and a bit ago ... 

Well she still has none despite a week long state visit to the most right wing state in the commonwealth from the party leader herself.

Great result for Labor. Despite Truffles bleats to the contrary, there will be no preference deals between Libs and PHONy, not because of Libs, but because Libs are poison to PHONy They will ensure a split right vote and the certainty of a Labor govt 

Why would you lie PT? ... your credibility is teetering on so many levels already!Dead 
Since the last WA election, the One Nation Vote went from 0% - that's NO VOTES - to 8% in the seats that they ran in, a massive result.

Again, her big mistake was to hop on board the Titanic with Captain Barnett!Cry

He was gooooone after the last election, and the polls from a year ago were exactly right - hardly a surprise to anyone.

So, A NOTHING RESULT FOR LABOR ... meaningless in fact.Cool

Very reminiscent result to when John Howard was perceived to be past his use by date and YOU voted in Kevin Rudd ... didn't take the nation long to regret that one, AGAIN,and AGAIN, and AGAIN!LOL


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2017 at 8:14am
Image result for keep sipping your kool aid meme

-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2017 at 2:47pm
The old, "I lied, so I will deflect" defence ... again PT!Ermm

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2017 at 5:18pm

Pauline Hanson warns One Nation's assault on WA will be bigger than predicted

Brendan Foster 
Published: January 19, 2017 - 1:29PM

Pauline Hanson has a stark warning for the major political parties in the lead up to the March state election: One Nation's assault in WA will be bigger than anyone predicted.

Political experts are predicting One Nation could pick up to as much as 11 per cent of the primary vote meaning the party could control the balance of power in the Upper House.

While Ms Hanson isn't expecting a Trump-style victory when WA goes to the polls in two months time, she told WAtoday the vote will be higher than political pundits predicted, with a lot of "sleeper voters" out in the WA electorate casting their vote for One Nation on the day.

One Nation is so confident of securing such a large chunk of the vote, it now believes it could secure as many as three Lower House seats.

Previously the party said it was content with winning a handful of seats in the Upper House.

"That's what happened in the last federal election and if you go back to 1998 Queensland election the polls were saying about 13 per cent when we actually polled just under 23 per cent," Ms Hanson told WAtoday over a coffee in East Perth. 

"So there are a lot of sleepers out there. So don't treat us like mushrooms... we want accountability and integrity."

Ms Hanson, who is in Perth on Thursday to announce up to 60 candidates to run in the March election, said the party had lost the "tag" as just another "right wing party".

"A lot more people are coming out and saying they are going to support One Nation," she said.

"Back 20 years ago it was 'we were too much of a right wing party' and I think that tag has been lost from One Nation.

"We have gained more credibility because we have put up more polices. Even the leaders like Colin Barnett and Malcolm Turnbull say we have more centre policies. The thing is, my policies have not changed over the years they have just been reported differently."

One Nation Party veteran Colin Tincknell said the Liberal Party was scrambling to stitch up deals with the party because it feared it was going to lose the election.

"They have come to us because they want our preferences, because they think they are going to lose this election," he said.

"But we have said to them we are not going to choose you or choose Labor.

"We've had discussion with 20 different independents.

"Realistically we will pick two or three seats in the Lower House and up to five in the Upper House.

"But that will be the first time ever that One Nation would have won a lower house seat in WA."

Given the short and controversial political career of former One Nation WA senator Rod Culleton, Ms Hanson said she personally vetted candidates selected to run in the March election.

"I want to ensure people here I will not throw someone into a seat purely to have candidates in that seat," she said.

"If they are not up to doing the job they won't be selected and that's my opinion right across the country."

Ms Hanson, who claims to have more social media followers than Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull and federal opposition leader Bill Shorten, said WA Premier Colin Barnett had to make a "stance" on the burqa for fear of losing conservative voters to One Nation.

Mr Barnett said on Wednesday while he would not legislate to ban the burqa in WA,  http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/premier-colin-barnett-muslims-should-not-wear-the-burqa-in-public-20170118-gttwwv.html" rel="nofollow - he "encouraged"  Muslims not to wear it in public because "it's not part of our culture".

"People just want equality... I think we've got to have equality here you just have someone covered in a burqa walking into a bank," Ms Hanson said.

"There is not identification whatsoever.

"Multiculturalism is destroying the real Aussie spirit in the states".

University of WA political scientist William Bowe said it would tough for One Nation to win seats in the Lower House.

"The Nationals have presumably done a good job of courting disaffection in regional areas that might otherwise stand to benefit them," he said.

"But the fact of them scooping up at least 10 per cent of the vote makes life a lot more complicated for Labor, particularly if there's a preference deal with the Liberals.

"I don't think that should be overstated – they don't have the base of volunteers to get how-to-vote cards in the hands of voters in every polling booth like the major parties do – but a share of the anti-government vote that might otherwise have gone straight to Labor will be picked up by One Nation instead, and a lot of it will filter back to the Liberals as preferences."

  • http://twitter.com/#!/WAtoday" rel="nofollow - Follow WAtoday on Twitter

This story was found at: http://www.watoday.com.au/wa-news/pauline-hanson-warns-one-nations-assault-on-wa-will-be-bigger-than-predicted-20170119-gtukps.html



-------------


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2017 at 5:20pm
Was Pauline lying, pretending to have supporters in WA?

btw, your desperation is dribbling off your chin. Need to get a grip mate


-------------


Posted By: horlicks
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2017 at 7:47pm



Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2017 at 11:30pm
Originally posted by horlicks horlicks wrote:


Rangaphobics!Cry


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2017 at 11:38pm
Originally posted by Passing Through Passing Through wrote:

Was Pauline lying, pretending to have supporters in WA?

btw, your desperation is dribbling off your chin. Need to get a grip mate

Just another case of Fake News PT ... you know Pauline only parrots what she's told, you know she's too stupid to have an opinion on anything ... why dredge up comments from a couple of months ago? ... why so obsessed with her demise PT? ... still at about 30% in Victorian polls ... more lies?

btw, no need to guild the lily, the truth will set you free, mate!Big smile 


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: acacia alba
Date Posted: 14 Mar 2017 at 11:40pm
Originally posted by horlicks horlicks wrote:



Golly !!!    Leake got crucified for similar to this !!!  


-------------
animals before people.


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 15 Mar 2017 at 4:14am
Third biggest Political Party in WA, been there a year, eclipsing the The Greens who have been there since 1990 and The Nats ... well, the less said the betterOuch.

Legislative Council

Count Progress: 67.66%

Progressive Statewide First Preference Vote By Party

Liberal Party 286,894
Pauline Hanson's One Nation 83,120
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 23,335
The Greens (WA) 80,822
THE NATIONALS 46,116
WA Labor 433,716

Surely The Greens are now irrelevant to Australian Politics?Dead ... just a radical fringe far left micro party, full of unhinged hateful communists with out of touch views, being ignored or reviled by the mainstream of the electorate ... oh, and of course, the sensible and reasonable partner in the CFMEUALPGreens Coalition.Big smile


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 12:29am
Since the lying failed, looks like the leftards are adopting the ABC/Fairfax policy ... if you don't like it, ignore it and hope it will go away ... Dead

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Afros
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 6:50am
According to the latest results your Messiah and her party are now behind both the Greens and the Nationals as well as the ALP and Libs...


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 7:52am
She is doing Australia a great service Afros. Now that she has found ON cannot get into bed with the Libs she will ensure a wedge is driven straight through the heart of the far right, forcing the Liberal Party to move back towards the sensible centre if they are to survive. The Labor Party went through the same process in the 50;s and 60's through the DLP. As Tones said of Muslims, Libs must go through a reformation process to survive and Pauline is forcing it. The tail has to stop wagging the Lib dog

-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 7:05pm
More gelati talk from the lying leftards!Embarrassed

Legislative Council

Count Progress: 74.91%

Progressive Statewide First Preference Vote By Party


Liberal Party 316,665
Pauline Hanson's One Nation 92,907
The Greens (WA) 90,758
THE NATIONALS 50,841
WA Labor 479,200


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 7:25pm
I thought you said she had no supporters in WA Confused

-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 7:51pm
Sorry, what lie is that now?Approve

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 7:56pm
You said she started from a base of no supporters last week when I said she started with 13% and it fell to 7%, didn't you? Are you walking away from that now? 

Like... I didn't say ''wiretapping'' I said ''wiretapping''?


-------------


Posted By: Second Chance
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 7:59pm
Only a matter of time before Doc is headhunted to take over from Sean Spicer.  Big smile


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 8:02pm
Or James Ashby

-------------


Posted By: Second Chance
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 8:07pm
In which case he'd be head-jobbed rather than head-hunted.  Shocked


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 8:11pm
Image result for not that theres anything wrong with that meme

-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 8:22pm
Originally posted by Passing Through Passing Through wrote:

You said she started from a base of no supporters last week when I said she started with 13% and it fell to 7%, didn't you? Are you walking away from that now? 

Like... I didn't say ''wiretapping'' I said ''wiretapping''?

I said she started from a base of 0% ... that was her share of the primary vote at the last WA election ... 

truth
noun
  1. the quality or state of being true.
    "he had to accept the truth of her accusation"
    synonyms: https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+veracity&forcedict=veracity&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIHDAA" rel="nofollow - veracity ,  https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+truthfulness&forcedict=truthfulness&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIHTAA" rel="nofollow - truthfulness ,  https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+verity&forcedict=verity&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIHjAA" rel="nofollow - verity ,  https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+sincerity&forcedict=sincerity&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIHzAA" rel="nofollow - sincerity ,  https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+candour&forcedict=candour&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIIDAA" rel="nofollow - candour ,  https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+honesty&forcedict=honesty&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIITAA" rel="nofollow - honesty , genuineness; More
    https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+gospel&forcedict=gospel&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIIzAA" rel="nofollow -
    https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+accuracy&forcedict=accuracy&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIJDAA" rel="nofollow - https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+correctness&forcedict=correctness&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIJTAA" rel="nofollow - https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+rightness&forcedict=rightness&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIJjAA" rel="nofollow - https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+validity&forcedict=validity&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIJzAA" rel="nofollow - https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+authenticity&forcedict=authenticity&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIKDAA" rel="nofollow -
    https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+dishonesty&forcedict=dishonesty&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIKTAA" rel="nofollow - https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+falsity&forcedict=falsity&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIKjAA" rel="nofollow -
    • that which is true or in accordance with fact or reality.
      noun: the truth
      "tell me the truth"
      synonyms:the fact of the matter, what actually/really happened, the case,  https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+so&forcedict=so&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoILDAA" rel="nofollow - so ; More
      https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+gospel&forcedict=gospel&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoILjAA" rel="nofollow - https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+Gods+truth&forcedict=Gods+truth&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoILzAA" rel="nofollow -
      https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+reality&forcedict=reality&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIMDAA" rel="nofollow - https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+real+life&forcedict=real+life&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIMTAA" rel="nofollow - https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+actuality&forcedict=actuality&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIMjAA" rel="nofollow -
      https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+fiction&forcedict=fiction&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIMzAA" rel="nofollow -
    • a fact or belief that is accepted as true.
      plural noun: truths
      "the emergence of scientific truths"
      synonyms: https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+fact&forcedict=fact&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoINTAA" rel="nofollow - fact ,  https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+verity&forcedict=verity&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoINjAA" rel="nofollow - verity ,  https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+certainty&forcedict=certainty&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoINzAA" rel="nofollow - certainty ,  https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+certitude&forcedict=certitude&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIODAA" rel="nofollow - certitude ; More
      https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+law&forcedict=law&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIOjAA" rel="nofollow - https://www.google.com.au/search?rlz=1C1LENP_enAU573AU573&espv=2&biw=1067&bih=539&q=define+principle&forcedict=principle&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiv0OC22drSAhVBH5QKHcZcDlwQ_SoIOzAA" rel="nofollow -

 
try it sometime.
v
v
v
v
v
v


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 8:28pm
If she has a zero support base in WA, how did she win 3 upper house seats in 2002?

You know, before they locked her up for fraud and deregistered the party.

She won 3 seats without a preference deal then and only 2(predicted) with a deal this time

If she had no base, why did Barnett do a preference deal with her, committing political suicide? What did he think her zero supporters could do for him?


-------------


Posted By: Whale
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 8:36pm
Poor Doc, absolutely slaughtered with facts by PT, keeps coming back with pathetic responses Embarrassed


we are waiting lol


-------------
Victor Orban 1.74 m, Michael Bloomberg 1.73 m, Emmanual Macron 1.77 m, George Soros 1.8 m


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 8:38pm
You're the one making it up as you go along?

You're only as good as your last election! ... ask The Donald, he came from a base of 0% too! Big smile

... there's only ONE poll that countsWink


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 8:40pm
Originally posted by Whale Whale wrote:

Poor Doc, absolutely slaughtered with facts by PT, keeps coming back with pathetic responses Embarrassed


we are waiting lol

I was wondering where you were? ... surprised it took you so long to hop off his lap and blindly support the lies!Tongue


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Afros
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 9:14pm
More clutching at straws from our rambling rightard!

In the lower house, PHONy have little more then half the votes that the Greens have and also trail the Nationals, the story may be better in the upper house but I think the Greens 50,000 vote lead in the lower house puts PHONys 2000 vote upper house majority in the shade!

Not sure how our rambling rightard translates these numbers as meaning the greens are irrelevant but we wouldn't expect him to acknowledge anything that goes against what he wants to be the truth would we?


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 16 Mar 2017 at 9:17pm


-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 12:03am

Legislative Council[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Western_Australian_state_election,_2017&action=edit&section=5" rel="nofollow - edit ]

Western Australian state election, 11 March 2017 (counting still continuing) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Australian_state_election,_2017#cite_note-7" rel="nofollow - [7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Australian_state_election,_2017#cite_note-8" rel="nofollow - [8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Australian_Legislative_Council" rel="nofollow - Legislative Council
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Australian_state_election,_2013" rel="nofollow - << 2013  —  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Western_Australian_state_election,_2021&action=edit&redlink=1" rel="nofollow - 2021 >>

Enrolled voters1,593,222
Votes cast https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout" rel="nofollow - Turnout
Informal votesInformal3.1+0.2
Summary of votes by party
PartyPrimary votes %SwingSeatsChange
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Labor_Party" rel="nofollow - Labor 41.4+8.9 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Party_of_Australia" rel="nofollow - Liberal 27.5−20.1 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Nation_%28Australia%29" rel="nofollow - One Nation 8.0+8.0 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Greens" rel="nofollow - Greens 7.7−0.5 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Party_of_Western_Australia" rel="nofollow - WA Nationals 4.4−0.5 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooters,_Fishers_and_Farmers_Party" rel="nofollow - Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 2.2+0.5 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Christians" rel="nofollow - Christians 1.9−0.1 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Democratic_Party_%28Australia%29" rel="nofollow - Liberal Democrats 1.8+1.8 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Justice_Party" rel="nofollow - Animal Justice 1.0+1.0 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_First_Party" rel="nofollow - Family First 0.8−0.6 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_Saving_Party" rel="nofollow - Daylight Saving 0.6+0.6 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_Business_Party" rel="nofollow - Micro Business 0.5+0.5 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Matheson_for_Western_Australia" rel="nofollow - Julie Matheson for WA 0.4+0.4 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flux_%28political_party%29" rel="nofollow - Flux the System! 0.4+0.4 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluoride_Free_WA" rel="nofollow - Fluoride Free WA 0.3+0.3 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Alliance_%28Australia%29" rel="nofollow - Socialist Alliance 0.1+0.1 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_politician" rel="nofollow - Independent 1.0−0.7 
Total  36 


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 12:17am
Yep, it is what it is, no matter how the liars want to spin it!Wink

Pauline Hanson's One Nation is feeling the love of the peopleHeart, having increased their vote from 0% to 8% across the state in the WA election, and eclipsing the Nationals and the Greens as the preferred party after the two established majors !Thumbs Up 

An amazing outcome for a party that had put together a perty and a campaign in all of about 5 minutes in comparison to the irrelevant Greens micro party, who's out of touch radical ideologies voters are clearly being seen for what they are.Clap

... and the leftards hate it so much, they have to lie, and lie and lie some more!Dead

Bring on Queensland!!!Big smile 


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Afros
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 6:53am
Kind of sad you've got to jump on this mob just to feel like you're on a winner Dr Rightard...


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 3:27pm
Good for you Afros! ... now that you can ignore and reject the lies of the left, admit to the truth, that the rational real people are finally having their voice heard, and gaining traction in these conversations, you too will be set free!Hug

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Afros
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 3:50pm
Yay... I look forward to a life of fearing and rejecting change and all that is different from myself alongside other rightards...


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:00pm
Well the alternative is to accept a humourless existence, of covert boob binding and penis tucking, and facing Mecca five times a day and praying that Allah doesn't notice ... oh, and being "OUTRAGED" about everything that moves (and if it doesn't move, prod it with a stuck!).Thumbs Down

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:00pm
*stick

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Whale
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:07pm
Originally posted by Dr E Dr E wrote:

Well the alternative is to accept a humourless existence, of covert boob binding and penis tucking, and facing Mecca five times a day and praying that Allah doesn't notice ... oh, and being "OUTRAGED" about everything that moves (and if it doesn't move, prod it with a stuck!).Thumbs Down




https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjz3M_i79zSAhWHk5QKHd89DhgQjRwIBw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fimgflip.com%2Fi%2Fjonz0&psig=AFQjCNEETZWtXaHNDmlOj0O6ObBiU9nmHQ&ust=1489817214586226" rel="nofollow">Image result for oh the irony

-------------
Victor Orban 1.74 m, Michael Bloomberg 1.73 m, Emmanual Macron 1.77 m, George Soros 1.8 m


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:35pm
I'm not the one screaming abuse because they are so insulted and offended, and demanding that the person with the alternative view to yours be banished forever from the conversationCry  ... that would be you ya' sook!LOL

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:37pm
... can you stop wasting your time arguing for a losing cause, and find me some decent winners for tomorrow?Stern Smile

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: scamanda
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 7:00pm
Originally posted by Dr E Dr E wrote:

Pauline Hanson's One Nation is feeling the love of the peopleHeart, having increased their vote from 0% to 8% across the state in the WA election, and eclipsing the Nationals and the Greens as the preferred party after the two established majors !Thumbs Up 



Is it true that One Nation actually outgunned the Greens in WA? Shocked
Wow, not bad for a fledgling party. Well fledgling compared to the Greens.

With One Nation likely to swap preference with the LNP in Qld where it continues to gain momentum, it will probably be goodbye to the Palaszczuk/Trad/Jones government and another rehash of Queensland Racing and Grace Grace's reshuffling.



-------------
I started with nothing and still have most of it left


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 7:12pm
Didn't Pauline say the other day that she has got the message load and clear from her WA experience, and that she wont be doing any preference deals in future? She asked Ashby to ''please explain'' why he talked her into it.

-------------


Posted By: Afros
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 8:51pm
Originally posted by scamanda scamanda wrote:

Originally posted by Dr E Dr E wrote:

Pauline Hanson's One Nation is feeling the love of the peopleHeart, having increased their vote from 0% to 8% across the state in the WA election, and eclipsing the Nationals and the Greens as the preferred party after the two established majors !Thumbs Up 




Is it true that One Nation actually outgunned the Greens in WA? Shocked
Wow, not bad for a fledgling party. Well fledgling compared to the Greens.

With One Nation likely to swap preference with the LNP in Qld where it continues to gain momentum, it will probably be goodbye to the Palaszczuk/Trad/Jones government and another rehash of Queensland Racing and Grace Grace's reshuffling.



On current counts they are 50,000 behind the Greens in the lower house and 2000 in front of the Greens in the upper house, according to Dr Rightard this is a victory for PHONy.


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 11:37pm
Afros, stop being mischievous! ... you're starting to sound like Waleed trying to convince us that the ALP has an economic policy!LOL

Unless you actually believe what you are saying ... Embarrassed


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 11:57pm
One more time, just for you PT, the facts, and nothing but the facts ... read 'em and weep!Big smile

Labor swing +8.8%
One Nation swing +8.1%
Greens swing -0.3%
Nationals swing -0.5%
Shooters, Fishers and Farmers swing +0.5%
Flux The System! swing +.04% 

Pauline was almost as successful as the ALP in increasing her popularity! ... Simply Outstanding!Clap

The Greens were an embarrassing FAIL!Dead ... did better than the Nats (narrowly) but worse than the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers, and worse than "Flux The System!" ... whom ever the fcuk they are!!!???LOL

Legislative Council[ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Western_Australian_state_election,_2017&action=edit&section=5" rel="nofollow - edit ]

Western Australian state election, 11 March 2017 (counting still continuing) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Australian_state_election,_2017#cite_note-8" rel="nofollow - [8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Australian_state_election,_2017#cite_note-9" rel="nofollow - [9]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Australian_Legislative_Council" rel="nofollow - Legislative Council
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Western_Australian_state_election,_2013" rel="nofollow - << 2013  —  https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Western_Australian_state_election,_2021&action=edit&redlink=1" rel="nofollow - 2021 >>

Enrolled voters1,593,222
Votes cast https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_turnout" rel="nofollow - Turnout
Informal votesInformal3.0+0.2
Summary of votes by party
PartyPrimary votes %SwingSeatsChange
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Labor_Party" rel="nofollow - Labor 41.3+8.8 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Party_of_Australia" rel="nofollow - Liberal 27.3−20.4 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/One_Nation_%28Australia%29" rel="nofollow - One Nation 8.1+8.1 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Greens" rel="nofollow - Greens 7.9−0.3 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Party_of_Western_Australia" rel="nofollow - National 4.4−0.5 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooters,_Fishers_and_Farmers_Party" rel="nofollow - Shooters, Fishers and Farmers 2.3+0.5 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Christians" rel="nofollow - Christians 1.9−0.1 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Democratic_Party_%28Australia%29" rel="nofollow - Liberal Democrats 1.8+1.8 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Justice_Party" rel="nofollow - Animal Justice 1.0+1.0 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_First_Party" rel="nofollow - Family First 0.8−0.6 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight_Saving_Party" rel="nofollow - Daylight Saving 0.6+0.6 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_Business_Party" rel="nofollow - Micro Business 0.5+0.5 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flux_%28political_party%29" rel="nofollow - Flux the System! 0.4+0.4 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julie_Matheson_for_Western_Australia" rel="nofollow - Matheson for WA 0.4+0.4 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fluoride_Free_WA" rel="nofollow - Fluoride Free WA 0.3+0.3 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialist_Alliance_%28Australia%29" rel="nofollow - Socialist Alliance 0.1+0.1 
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Independent_politician" rel="nofollow - Independent 1.0−0.7 
Total  36 


... and in case you were wondering, NO! ... you will not find these figures on the ABC website!Embarrassed


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 18 Mar 2017 at 6:40am
That is a very fine graphic, thanks Doc.

Could you please post one for the Legislative Assembly?

Thanks in advance Thumbs Up


-------------


Posted By: Shrunk in the Wash
Date Posted: 18 Mar 2017 at 7:56am
Looks like they are the 3rd most popular party in WA


Posted By: Afros
Date Posted: 18 Mar 2017 at 9:05am
Originally posted by Shrunk in the Wash Shrunk in the Wash wrote:

Looks like they are the 3rd most popular party in WA


Current votes totals behind the majors.

Lower House (86.69% counted)
Greens 117,617
Nationals 71,174
One Nation 65,132

Upper House (80.35% counted)
One Nation 100,975
Greens 98,227
Nationals 55,507

On those numbers I think it's fair to say the Greens are still the third force. ABC are predicting 3 upper house seats for the Greens and 2 for PHON. The Nationals are predicted to get 4 incidentally, a result of their vote being concentrated in certain areas.

Factoring in the Greens much higher lower house vote I think it is fair to say they're still #3. PHON have still done ok and have the potential to set themselves up as the alternative on the right that the Greens are on the left although that'll depend on if they can maintain a consistent vote level over a number of elections as the Greens have and not be the flash in the pan when certain issues arrise as they have in the past.


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 18 Mar 2017 at 11:29am
Originally posted by Passing Through Passing Through wrote:

That is a very fine graphic, thanks Doc.

Could you please post one for the Legislative Assembly?

Thanks in advance Thumbs Up

If you want to analyse each seat, go right ahead!

The Greens contested EVERY seat, One Nation contested half of them ... the LA results tell us nothing - they are NOT REPRESENTATIVE OF THE STATE WIDE VOTE ... but you're not stupid, you know that!Wink

HOW ABOUT YOU JUST ACCEPT THE TRUTH???Confused ... you will be a better person for the exercise ... it could even prove to be habit forming ... works for me!Big smile


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 18 Mar 2017 at 11:31am
Originally posted by Shrunk in the Wash Shrunk in the Wash wrote:

Looks like they are the 3rd most popular party in WA

Yep, the evidence is obvious, unless you are trying to deceive yourself ...


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 18 Mar 2017 at 11:31am
can't handle the truth!

-------------


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 18 Mar 2017 at 11:52am
Doc, how many PHON voters do you reckon didn't vote for PHON in the LC?

-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 18 Mar 2017 at 12:15pm
Originally posted by Afros Afros wrote:

Originally posted by Shrunk in the Wash Shrunk in the Wash wrote:

Looks like they are the 3rd most popular party in WA


Current votes totals behind the majors.

Lower House (86.69% counted)
Greens 117,617
Nationals 71,174
One Nation 65,132

Upper House (80.35% counted)
One Nation 100,975
Greens 98,227
Nationals 55,507

On those numbers I think it's fair to say the Greens are still the third force. ABC are predicting 3 upper house seats for the Greens and 2 for PHON. The Nationals are predicted to get 4 incidentally, a result of their vote being concentrated in certain areas.

Factoring in the Greens much higher lower house vote I think it is fair to say they're still #3. PHON have still done ok and have the potential to set themselves up as the alternative on the right that the Greens are on the left although that'll depend on if they can maintain a consistent vote level over a number of elections as the Greens have and not be the flash in the pan when certain issues arise as they have in the past.

Afros, your first mistake is listening to PT's attempts to spin his now standard deception and BS - he would like you to ignore the fact that The Greens contested ALL 59 SEATS (won zero), whilst One Nation only contested half of them - so even on that basis, One nation did proportionally better than The Greens in the lower house.

However, the Upper House is what matters, being a State Wide Count, and is the only way to measure the true popularity of all parties contesting the election. 

Yes, PHON had an absolute shocker in the week leading up, their result was poor compared with their national polling in recent times, and yet, and the scary thing for the socialists, they STILL created all kinds of records ... and quite simply, ARE PROVEN to be more popular in WA than The Greens, and ONLY behind the two major parties ... just watch Queensland!

Sadly, PT is just spinning BS ... Like so many Left Wing sooks, he lost it and never recovered when Trump won, now refuses to accept the umpire's decisions, and tends to argue even when the facts are irrefutable ... somehow, they all think democracy is a bad thing, and lies and deception are Ok now.Dead

I hope that makes it clearer for you.


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: maccamax
Date Posted: 18 Mar 2017 at 4:11pm
  Your still at half pace Dr E ..          AND carrying the No 1 saddlecloth .
 
       That video on Dicken's Cider  had you to draw well clear.
 
 Precious Pauline will save us .


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 18 Mar 2017 at 9:45pm
... better on top of the ground too maccamax!Wink

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 21 Mar 2017 at 3:03am
Latest Newspoll has confirmed just how irrelevant the WA election was.

Primary support;

Liberals 37%
ALP 35%
One Nation solid at 10%
Greens 9% and falling like a stone.

... and speaking of anchors, Bill Shorten's approval rating continues to go south. 

Interesting that this NATIONAL poll is of no interest to the Hanson Haters ...Ermm


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 21 Mar 2017 at 8:36am
I hope you aren't including me in the PHONy haters column.Shocked

i love themHeart, they not only make you feel so much better about yourself, but they are splitting the loony right vote which will boot this miserable ineffectual impotent LNP govt to the kerb .

Go Pauline Thumbs Up


-------------


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 23 Mar 2017 at 8:48am
Here we go again: The LNP are clearly in trouble and as usual, go straight to the gutter. I expect if the electoral commission finds nothing Truffles will call a Royal Commission on them

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/one-nation-finances-investigated-amid-internal-row/news-story/029181ccd28c980866e150f479f7fe9a?utm_content=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=EditorialSF&utm_source=TheAustralian&utm_medium=Twitter" rel="nofollow - http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/one-nation-finances-investigated-amid-internal-row/news-story/029181ccd28c980866e150f479f7fe9a?utm_content=SocialFlow&utm_campaign=EditorialSF&utm_source=TheAustralian&utm_medium=Twitter

The Australian Electoral Commission has launched an audit of Pauline Hanson’s One Nation, amid revelations of an internal brawl over sensitive documents.

One Nation confirmed to The Australian that an audit was under way and categorised it as “run of the mill”, but the party’s former treasurer, Ian Nelson, ­described the probe as “hardly standard”.



-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 23 Mar 2017 at 1:11pm
What's up PT? ... do you want to pick and choose which laws apply to Pauline now? ... She's not a corrupt Union official you know!Wink

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: acacia alba
Date Posted: 23 Mar 2017 at 1:17pm
I bet PT is a Clover Moore groupie Wink

-------------
animals before people.


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 23 Mar 2017 at 1:54pm
Stand down patriots, I was actually defending Pauline

-------------


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 23 Mar 2017 at 3:01pm
Why is Pauline suddenly exempt from the law ... especially if she is proven to be a repeat offender ...?  

-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 23 Mar 2017 at 3:25pm
Has she done something wrong?

-------------


Posted By: Passing Through
Date Posted: 23 Mar 2017 at 3:31pm
Doesn't being proven to be a serial offender suggest she has done something wrong before?

-------------


Posted By: maccamax
Date Posted: 23 Mar 2017 at 9:34pm
The London episode is more votes for Pauline.
 
     The media are replaying the Wilson Tuckey predictions ,  and like Pauline Hanson ,   How right he was.
 
     Who do you think was a Muslim defender all those years ago    =         One Malcolm Turnbull.


Posted By: Dr E
Date Posted: 23 Mar 2017 at 9:57pm
Look maccamax, there is simply no evidence to support any assertion that Islam is not a religion of peace and feminism, or that it holds any threat to the future of peaceful western democratic societies.

... but we will never see rain in Australia again, and impeach Trump.


-------------
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!


Posted By: acacia alba
Date Posted: 24 Mar 2017 at 11:15am
Dr E . You dont mean to say the nut job in London did that in the name of Allah, the man of peace, do you ??Confused
I bet there was a big celebration in Lakemba last night , with cheers all round.  


-------------
animals before people.


Posted By: maccamax
Date Posted: 24 Mar 2017 at 1:55pm
  British born 52 year old .
 When will the fools realise the family environment and teachings will surface in adult life no matter where the bXasards are born.             The brain wash in infancy never leaves any of us .
 
   Peaceful Muslims choose to stay with the cult that produces these atrocities so all guns ablaze is fair enough.
   Precious Pauline is the only one making sense .       Keep bringing them in and we deserve what we get .
          Turnbull can't see a fly on his nose.


Posted By: cabosanlucas
Date Posted: 24 Mar 2017 at 2:25pm
Originally posted by maccamax maccamax wrote:


  British born 52 year old .
 When will the fools realise the family environment and teachings will surface in adult life no matter where the bXasards are born.             The brain wash in infancy never leaves any of us .
 
   Peaceful Muslims choose to stay with the cult that produces these atrocities so all guns ablaze is fair enough.
   Precious Pauline is the only one making sense .       Keep bringing them in and we deserve what we get .
          Turnbull can't see a fly on his nose.


that kathleen murphy piece suggesting the left need to have a sense of patriotism in their platform (patriotism is a dirty word on the left) is interesting.

some level of patriotism is good. Its uniting. fanatical patriotism is dangerous and subordinate.

im all for muslim immigration, just as i am for any migrant seeking safety, a better life etc. but since its the govt who bring them here...its the govts role to have all the infrastructure and social planning in place to cope. any gripes on that front should be dire ted at the govt, not the migrant.

Back to patriotism...as far as i know, middle eastern people are generally tribal in their social structure and allegiances. family lineage is very important too. but patriotism or an allegiance to a nation or country?? not so much.

taking all that into account, is that a hurdle with middle eastern assimilation in western countries? if it is, how is it overcome?

you cant say "no we dont want you". but its obviously a very challenging scenario




Posted By: cabosanlucas
Date Posted: 24 Mar 2017 at 2:35pm
we cant force western democracy on arab countries for this very reason - their social system is tribal, village, family etc. our interpretation of democracy is different. how did the iraq war turn out?? ...after the bs weapons of mass destruction lie was exposed, the west simply changed the argument to "impose democracy and free the iraq people" .

but what happens when its reversed... i,e. arab migrants enter a western democracy?

clearly their is problems. Dunno what the best answers are.



Posted By: jujuno
Date Posted: 24 Mar 2017 at 3:16pm
Originally posted by maccamax maccamax wrote:

  British born 52 year old .
 When will the fools realise the family environment and teachings will surface in adult life no matter where the bXasards are born.             The brain wash in infancy never leaves any of us .
 
   Peaceful Muslims choose to stay with the cult that produces these atrocities so all guns ablaze is fair enough.
   Precious Pauline is the only one making sense .       Keep bringing them in and we deserve what we get .
          Turnbull can't see a fly on his nose.

 haven't noticed all you Catholic Church followers deserting the flock because paedophiles are rampant in the priesthood...

 Australians should renounce citizenship because Martin Bryant killed 35 people...

 and no-one should ever countenance entertaining the Germans or Japanese...

 tar everyone...stupid logic...but typical of RWNJ's...

 

 

 

 


-------------
Desert War, Rain Lover, Latin Knight, Hay List, Mustard...my turf heroes...



Print Page | Close Window

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05 - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd. - https://www.webwiz.net