Ready to give up Control of our Borders?

I think this part of the forum has hit "off season" in every thread I've read the last few days.

Second Chance wrote: Had a good friend and cricket partner who sadly died a couple of years ago. A lovely bloke. He was an inveterate writer of "letters to the editor" in the days before the technological revolution.  He forwarded letter after letter, most not worth the paper they were typed on. However the Age and/or Herald printed many of them, doubtlessly because he was locked into one end of the political spectrum and attracted rejoinders from those disagreed and support from those who shared his mind-set. So almost every time I read Doc's contributions on here I'm very much reminded of good old Thomas A. W-tkin.

Dr E wrote: Second Chance wrote: Had a good friend and cricket partner who sadly died a couple of years ago. A lovely bloke. He was an inveterate writer of "letters to the editor" in the days before the technological revolution.  He forwarded letter after letter, most not worth the paper they were typed on. However the Age and/or Herald printed many of them, doubtlessly because he was locked into one end of the political spectrum and attracted rejoinders from those disagreed and support from those who shared his mind-set. So almost every time I read Doc's contributions on here I'm very much reminded of good old Thomas A. W-tkin.   Nice recollection SC - sounds like your friend was attempting to contribute to his society - what have you ever done, other than deny factual statements that you don't like, and supported morons who have absolutely nothing to contribute, like the other mini mes ...? It's Ok, a balanced society is incomplete without the likes of you lot.

Another 17 post thread dominated by the circle club to boost the 2018 General thread tally competition?

Passing Through wrote: Another 17 post thread dominated by the circle club to boost the 2018 General thread tally competition? Sounds like fun

Think you got your threads muddled up PT. More concentration required

Whale wrote: Dr E wrote: Second Chance wrote: Had a good friend and cricket partner who sadly died a couple of years ago. A lovely bloke. He was an inveterate writer of "letters to the editor" in the days before the technological revolution.  He forwarded letter after letter, most not worth the paper they were typed on. However the Age and/or Herald printed many of them, doubtlessly because he was locked into one end of the political spectrum and attracted rejoinders from those disagreed and support from those who shared his mind-set. So almost every time I read Doc's contributions on here I'm very much reminded of good old Thomas A. W-tkin.   Nice recollection SC - sounds like your friend was attempting to contribute to his society - what have you ever done, other than deny factual statements that you don't like, and supported morons who have absolutely nothing to contribute, like the other mini mes ...? It's Ok, a balanced society is incomplete without the likes of you lot.  you know a lot for a clueless idiot. You have no idea what SC has done and you make your moronic judgement based on a difference in political views  What have you ever done Doc apart from post 70 screaming messages per day on an anonymous forum in a frenzied, manic, uncontrollable mist pf rage

rusty nails wrote: Dr E wrote: rusty nails wrote: Going with both red and pink today? How is he racist? There were good people on both sides...... There are many,many other examples,but one is enough to prove the point. screeching in pink about the pornstars lawyer doesn’t make you or your orange mate less racist,it just makes you look unfocused and unbalanced. What, there were no good ANTIFA THUGS? ... that seems reasonable, but how is that an example of TRUMP being racist? ... he just said something that the lefties didn't like, you dope! many,many,many,many,many,many other examples that you can't articulate, because they don't exist. You are just a classic example of the "Useful Idiot" ...  blah, blah, blah, you simply repeat gelati like a parrot, with no comprehension. Trump is not a racist. Hey Dummy! You forget to respond to the article about old mate the racist? or is it the old lets ignore the facts I don’t like tactic? Here’s the link again ....... https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2018/01/15/opinion/leonhardt-trump-racist.html Just one more thing. Before you start,put your big boy pants on,and the coloured ink away. Can’t wait to see your “research” on this

maccamax wrote: Trump a Racist.?    Was his wife born in Washington. Or did he marry her to punish migrants.

rusty nails wrote: The finger painter once again demonstrating his lack of comprehension skills. It’s an opinion piece that lists the many ways the orange one has behaved in a racist manner. Ask one of the nurses to explain it,when she’s changing the nappy.

Change of colour?
Comprehension requires the reading and understanding of complete sentences.

Ignoring the bits that don’t suit you doesn’t help you.

Let me help.

One of the first on the list is that he was found guilty in the courts of discrimination of tenants on racial grounds.
Secondly,he still insists the death penalty was appropriate for a bunch of kids,even after they were exonerated with DNA evidence.
Start with those two.
There’s plenty more.......

Yet he signed a 31 page decree order that explicitly prohibited him to discriminate on racial grounds.

If you don’t think his position re the central park 5 wasn’t racist.
Then there’s even less hope for you than I had thought.

rusty nails wrote: Change of colour? Comprehension requires the reading and understanding of complete sentences. Ignoring the bits that don’t suit you doesn’t help you. Let me help. One of the first on the list is that he was found guilty in the courts of discrimination of tenants on racial grounds. Secondly,he still insists the death penalty was appropriate for a bunch of kids,even after they were exonerated with DNA evidence. Start with those two. There’s plenty more.......

rusty nails wrote: The finger painter once again demonstrating his lack of comprehension skills. It’s an opinion piece that lists the many ways the orange one has behaved in a racist manner. Ask one of the nurses to explain it,when she’s changing the nappy.

Ah bugger... back to the same lines again. I had hope.

rusty nails wrote: Yet he signed a 31 page decree order that explicitly prohibited him to discriminate on racial grounds. If you don’t think his position re the central park 5 wasn’t racist. Then there’s even less hope for you than I had thought.

Whale wrote: rusty nails wrote: Change of colour? Comprehension requires the reading and understanding of complete sentences. Ignoring the bits that don’t suit you doesn’t help you. Let me help. One of the first on the list is that he was found guilty in the courts of discrimination of tenants on racial grounds. Secondly,he still insists the death penalty was appropriate for a bunch of kids,even after they were exonerated with DNA evidence. Start with those two. There’s plenty more....... bit like Doc, can never ever admit he was wrong, a sign of weakness or fallibility