Go to Villagebet.com.au for free horse racing tips - Click here now
Forum Home Forum Home > Community - Public Forums > Laundry Basket
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - China
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Thoroughbred Village Home Page. For village news, follow @TBVillage on Twitter. For horseracing tips, follow @Villagebet on Twitter. To contact the Mayor by email: Click Here.


China

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 66>
Author
Message
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79532
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 2:01pm

What is China buying in Australia? | CNBC Explains



Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 2:53pm

Reports sunken WWII ships in Asia looted by 'Chinese pirates'

ondon: Britain has launched an investigation into the plundering of British maritime war graves by Chinese pirates for scrap metal.

Ten ships, which were the final resting places for more than 1000 sailors and civilians who died off the Malaysian and Indonesian coasts during the World War II, have now been damaged or destroyed.

British Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson said he was "very concerned" to hear fresh allegations that four shipwrecks had been looted.It comes after six wrecks, including the Prince of Wales and Repulse, were feared to have been damaged or destroyed by scavengers.

The ships are often looted using dredgers, which pull the remains of the men up with the metal.Williamson said the British Government "absolutely condemns" the unauthorised disturbance of any wreck containing human remains.

"I am very concerned," he said. "We will work closely with the Indonesian and Malaysian governments to investigate these claims."t is thought that Chinese-owned barges had carried out many of the dredging operations.

The Mail on Sunday that said wrecks of HMS Tien Kwang, Kuala, Banka and Loch Ranza had recently been targeted.

Tien Kwang, a submarine chaser, and Kuala, an auxiliary patrol vessel, were carrying hundreds of evacuees when they were attacked by Japanese bombers near the Indonesian Riau Islands in February 1942.

Earlier that month, Loch Ranza, a cargo ship, had been set on fire in a Japanese air raid off the same islands and exploded, killing seven men.

RELATED ARTICLE

HMAS Perth.
< ="_1b7hv" style="-sizing: inherit; -webkit-appearance: none; font: inherit; border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; -: none; -: initial; -size: initial; -repeat: initial; -attachment: initial; -origin: initial; -clip: initial; : 20; : ; top: -10px; right: -10px; overflow: ; padding: 20px; cursor: pointer;">Add to shortlist

It came after Banka, a minesweeper, sank after hitting a mine off the coast of Malaysia in December 1941, killing its crew of four British officers and 34 Malaysian sailors.Looters are said to target the WWII-era wrecks because of the properties of their steel. Built before the advent of atomic weapons, the metal has absorbed little background radiation, making the material suitable for sensitive instruments.

The Ministry of Defence was attempting to create "special protection zones"' around the some of the sites.

Telegraph, London; AP

Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 2:54pm
Chinese enterprise i suppose pt?Wacko
Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79532
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 3:04pm
What should we do about this Isaac?
Back to Top
Carioca View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 13 Nov 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 21821
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Carioca Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 5:04pm
Probably where my kettle comes from lol, thought I had em tricked when I bought my Danish scan pan ...that is until I read the fine print when I got home ...you guessed it.
Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 5:13pm
The heats on ptLOL

http://www.abc.net.au/radio/programs/worldtoday/malaysian-chinese-leaders-to-meet-over-suspended-projects/10140208

Malaysian and Chinese leaders to meet over suspended infrastructure projects

t takes a bold leader to suspend his country's largest trading partner's billion-dollar infrastructure projects.

That's just what the newly elected Malaysian Prime Minster did with three of China's Belt and Road projects in Malaysia.

Tonight China's President Xi Xingping will meet the Prime Minister of Malaysia, Dr Mahathir Mohamad, to discuss the relationship between their two countries.

China expert Richard McGregor is a senior fellow at the Lowy Institute. He speaks with The World Today's Eleanor Hall.

Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79532
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 5:14pm
Do you think Turnbull will stand up to them Isaac?
Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 5:27pm
Turnbull does his best to please all. bur then you would expect that from his centralist position.

What would Shorten do pt? 

Even harder for shorten to contemplate....LOL

in fact, what DOES Shorten say?
Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79532
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 5:28pm
You will get to find out next year. Wink
Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 5:33pm

The Guardian view on China: unease at home and abroad

There are real and important problems to address, but Donald Trump’s trade war will not solve them
his has not been the easiest of summers for Xi Jinping and his country. Donald Trump’s tariffs have rattled nerves in Beijing, already unsettled by the slowing economy. The ministry of finance and the central bank have had an open spat over fiscal policy. There are grumblings that the leadership invited trouble with its unabashed projection of might; was too complacent about the risks of US trade action; and is struggling to respond. But even if trade talks make progress when they resume this week, the issue is a channel for frustrations as well as the proximate cause.The scrapping of presidential term limits this spring cemented Mr Xi’s extraordinary concentration of power. Yet in doing so it shocked and alienated even some sympathisers. Now there are signs of a pushback: gossip about political intrigue; a scathing essay from a well-known scholar. Meanwhile, a public health scandal over faulty vaccines given to children has undercut his drive to crush corruption and bring the bureaucracy into line: wasn’t it supposed to prevent things like this? The excitement engendered by these developments is in large part a sign of how rare any glimpse of disharmony has become. No one doubts that Mr Xi remains in control. The question is whether he will retain the same leeway in pursuing his course as his nation enters choppier waters. Less than a year ago, Mr Xi spoke of a new era which would see China moving “closer to centre stage and making greater contributions to mankind”, in a decisive break with the long-held maxim that the country should hide its light and bide its time. Now state newspapers warn of the dangers of hubris.Underlying the tariffs is the growing hostility to China across the American political class. Beijing is correct to detect Washington’s anxiety in the face of its economic, technological and military progress. But the strength and breadth of concern is prompted by China’s increasingly repressive turn at home, and forcefulness abroad. Mr Trump’s erraticism, bullying and ignorance and the US disengagement he pursues have given Beijing a unique opportunity to make friends and influence people. Yet Australia, so dependent on China economically, has sounded the alert about “sharp power” and covert influence operations. Last month, Germany effectively blocked China’s state grid from taking a majority stake in an electricity network, citing national security concernsIn Singapore, there are increasingly obvious nerves about China’s influence. Malaysia has suspended $23bn in Beijing-backed infrastructure projects. Thailand has announced the launch of a regional infrastructure fund, seen as an attempt to reduce reliance on Chinese investment. Countries are taking a hard look at their relationship with Beijing, and the true cost of attractive deals. The ambitious rhetoric has backfired – but even if it is scaled down, what really worries people are deeds not words. These range from established issues such as hacking and trade practices to the militarisation of the South China Sea and Sri Lanka’s debt-necessitated 99-year lease of Hambantota port to the Chinese state-owned corporation which built it.

The claim that the world, or at least the west, “got China wrong” is not quite right; more accurately, governments and businesses were often too hungry to do their due diligence, or to act upon the warnings they did receive. In any case, in the age of Mr Trump, climate change and a globalised economy, working with China is not a choice, but a necessity. This trade war is not a solution to the problems. What is needed is not more hostility, but more attention: a serious investment (not least linguistic) in truly understanding what China seeks and how it tries to achieve it. It means more nuance and sophistication, not less. It means recognising that it is normal for rising powers to seek to reshape rules, but determining what concrete problems this poses in light of its priorities and values – and how to address them. It means, for instance, closely examining Beijing’s systematic efforts to enlist the Chinese diaspora in its foreign influence work, without overreacting to public diplomacy, or scapegoating or stereotyping communities.It means, too, consistency: not least a real commitment to working with those who share similar values instead of selling each other out for short-term advantage. Needless to say this will be a particular challenge for Britain in the age of Brexit. It means understanding that rights and values are not a bolt-on or a luxury for better times, but must be fundamental to the relationship. It means bolstering institutions that defend them, and upholding standards through our behaviour as well as our statements. None of this is easy. But it is necessary when the alternatives are drift and wishful thinking on one hand, or kneejerk hawkishness on the other.

Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 5:35pm
Originally posted by Passing Through Passing Through wrote:

You will get to find out next year. Wink

what do YOU think he will do pt?

After Dastyaris effort, sack himself?
Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 5:37pm
HarryFlashman 
< ="u-- d-comment__recommend- rounded-icon" --name="Recommend comment" style="font: inherit; margin: 0px; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; overflow: ; touch-: manipulation; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; width: 1.1875rem; : rgb246, 246, 246; border-radius: 62.5rem; vertical-align: middle; : relative; height: 1.1875rem; top: 0.0625rem; : right;">01

China will get old before it gets rich.

And as for the ridiculous idea that China will become a great military power, surpassing the United States? Nonsense, starting from where China is now there isn't enough money in the world to create in 50 years what the US has lying around at its finger tips at the moment.

I am not saying China hasn't got a bit of steam left in her boiler, but the old thing is heating up badly, the pressure gauges are reading red, rivets are beginning to pop, the paint is starting to blister in alarming points and no amount of repainting can cover it up.

China, you could have done it, if you had started earlier, maybe 40 years earlier, but you left it too late. Sure the West isn't looking too sharp these days, it looks like the world is your oyster, but it never will be.

Stick to being a regional power, throw your weight around a bit against Vietnam or the Philippines if it makes you feel good, but the idea you will rule the world? Not this century, go back to the drawing board, come up with a different plan, maybe the 2100s will be your day in the sun.

  • < ="u-- d-comment__recommend- rounded-icon" --name="Recommend comment" style="font: inherit; margin: 0px; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; overflow: ; touch-: manipulation; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; width: 1.1875rem; : rgb246, 246, 246; border-radius: 62.5rem; vertical-align: middle; : relative; height: 1.1875rem; top: 0.0625rem; : right;">01

    What is feeling on India?

    I think there is massive potential in the U.S/India relationship and in having India as the most important country in the Commonwealth going forward.

  • < ="u-- d-comment__recommend- rounded-icon" --name="Recommend comment" style="font: inherit; margin: 0px; -webkit-font-smoothing: antialiased; overflow: ; touch-: manipulation; padding: 0px; border-width: 0px; border-style: initial; border-color: initial; width: 1.1875rem; : rgb246, 246, 246; border-radius: 62.5rem; vertical-align: middle; : relative; height: 1.1875rem; top: 0.0625rem; : right;">01

    India isn't trying to be a world dominator, no one feels threatened by India, I think India could quietly do well, but my goodness it needs to sort a lot of stuff out first.

Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79532
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 5:37pm
I dont think he will be neglecting our Pacific and northern neighbors as the current govt has done, driving them to China for assistance. 
Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 5:45pm
www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/19/the-guardian-view-on-china-unease-at-home-and-abroad

a comment i read, probably an article ive posted hereLOLsaid, 
Xi showed his hand too soon, 
he has underestimated his own peoples desire for capatalism, 
and luckily for the world, they are being pushed back against
the west thought, and rightly so, the chinese peoples would become more westernized and that doesnt suit a communist
is a money, power but perhaps more so, a cultural fight.

Do you think China will win pt? their peoples minds and souls are at stake here.....communism or capitalism?


Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79532
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20 Aug 2018 at 5:53pm
I wouldn't write China off just yet Isaac. They have a 25 and a 50 year plan, we have no clue, and no leadership, here or in America where it counts.
Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2018 at 1:51pm
3473 views since last Friday. wow. who reads this stuffLOL

Is it your bots, on high rotation pt?
Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2018 at 1:54pm

Huawei banned from 5G mobile infrastructure rollout in Australia

By national science, technology and environment reporter Michael Slezak and technology reporter Ariel Bogle

Updated 17 minutes ago

The Federal Government has banned Chinese-owned tech giant Huawei from taking part in the rollout of 5G mobile infrastructure over national security concerns.

Key points:

  • Huawei is one of the world's largest providers of telecommunications equipment
  • In 2012, it was banned from involvement in the NBN on the advice of ASIO
  • Huawei has denied it poses a national security risk and has "securely delivered wireless technology in Australia for close to 15 years"

Huawei Australia said on Twitter it was "extremely disappointed".

The Government said it would be interpreting rules announced last year as disqualifying any company that was "likely subject to extrajudicial directions from a foreign government that conflict with Australian law".

In a joint statement amid turmoil over the Liberal leadership, acting Home Affairs Minister Scott Morrison and Communications Minister Mitch Fifield also said vendors that could not adequately protect the network from interference would be ruled out.The statement did not explicitly name Huawei, but the tech company confirmed on Twitter it had been told by the Government it would be banned.

We have been informed by the Govt that Huawei & ZTE have been banned from providing 5G technology to Australia. This is a extremely disappointing result for consumers. Huawei is a world leader in 5G. Has safely & securely delivered wireless technology in Aust for close to 15 yrs

5G is the next generation of mobile technology, billed to deliver faster data speeds and virtually instant connections.

It will allow more people to use the network before it clogs up, and is expected to usher in the "network of things", facilitating mobile connections for driverless cars and smart appliances.

Huawei has argued that with or without them being involved in the 5G rollout in Australia, the technology will be made in China, and banning it would "decimate" the industry, slowing the rollout and lowering competition.

A spokesperson for Huawei told the ABC: "Huawei is a world leader in 5G and has safely and securely delivered wireless technology in Australia for close to 15 years."Mr Morrison said the Government's priority would "always be the safety and security of Australians".

"The Government will continue to engage and support Australians, including the telecommunications industry, to manage national security risks," he said in the joint statement.

The reforms in question are the Telecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR).

They come into effect on September 18, and include a security obligation requiring vendors to protect their networks against threats to national security.

Ban clearly directed at countering Chinese law: expert

Danielle Cave, senior analyst at the Australian Strategic Policy Institute's International Cyber Policy Centre, said the Government's decision was the right one.

She said Australia's ban on telecommunication companies "likely subject to extrajudicial directions" was clearly directed at addressing China's 2017 national intelligence law.

That country's new regulations demand that "any organisation or citizen shall support, assist, and cooperate with state intelligence work".

"I think that makes it incredibly difficult, as China's large telecommunication and internet-technology companies expand throughout the world, to not put Western governments … in a position where they have to be really wary," Ms Cave said.

"It's not hard to look at this [Chinese] law and say, 'well hang on, what does this mean in terms of international espionage?'."

There have also been cybersecurity concerns surrounding Huawei and its alleged links to the Chinese Government and military, Ms Cave said.

"If you piece all of those things together, I really don't think [the Federal Government] would have been able to allow Huawei full access to the 5G network," she added.

Huawei has previously denied it poses a national security risk and says it is 100 per cent owned by its employees — not the Chinese Government.

"We believe that companies like Huawei are privately owned, not owned by any committee or any government, and should be looked at and put into a competitive tendering," Huawei's Australian chairman John Lord said earlier this year.

"We're happy to have our equipment tested, we're happy to have it analysed."

Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2018 at 1:57pm

Huawei's history in Britain may help explain why Australia is so nervous

By political editor Andrew Probyn

Updated 16 Jun 2018, 1:38pm

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-06-16/huawei-britain-history-helps-explain-australia-anxiety/9875582

Back to Top
Second Chance View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Status: Online
Points: 45716
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Second Chance Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2018 at 2:18pm
News Corp article eh?  No surprise there.  LOL
Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23 Aug 2018 at 2:50pm
Is the ABC News corp? Who knew..sc didLOL
Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Sep 2018 at 10:35am

Steve Bannon predicts working-class revolt in Australia as China rises

Former chief strategist to Donald Trump, Steve Bannon has criticised Australia's approach to an aggressive China, labelling it weak and saving his most blunt assessment for former prime minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Key points:

  • Mr Bannon plans on taking his economic nationalist message to Australia before the next election
  • He says Mr Trump confronting China was key to his successful appeal to voters
  • He rejects the idea his ideology is racist, saying US workers are 'finally standing up for themselves'

"People are going to be held accountable in the next 10 or 20 years about 'what did you know about China?', 'how did you accommodate it?'" he said.

"They absolutely have to be confronted now. Turnbull has been way too much of an appeaser."

In an exclusive interview with Four Corners, Mr Bannon identified Australia as the "canary in the mineshaft" — a warning of the consequences of not standing up to China.

"Australia can show you when good and decent people kind of play by the rules and the next thing they look around and many of the economic resources and economic assets of a country are owned by another country," he said.

"China thinks of the United States and Australia in the same way. They think we're tributary states."

In a recent speech at the University of New South Wales, Mr Turnbull criticised protectionist trade policies and asserted Australia's interest in pursuing an economic relationship with China, "consistent with our [Australia's] objectives, standards and priorities".hile crediting the Federal Government's introduction of laws last year pushing back against Chinese political interference in Australia, Mr Bannon said Mr Turnbull's recent statements were a backwards step.

"You have a much more robust debate in Australia than we're having here in the United States. In the United States, we're just starting that," Mr Bannon said.

"It doesn't really deal with political ideology. You have many progressives down there saying, 'hey, were quite upset about this'. So I think… it's going to play out very interestingly, and I think Australia is at the tip of the spear of this."

Trump prepared to 'go all the way' with China: Bannon

The Australia-China relationship has already been tested in recent months, with legislation introduced to crack down on foreign interference and the decision to shut the Chinese telecommunications giant, Huawei, out of Australia's 5G network on national security grounds.The architect of Donald Trump's 2016 presidential victory says confronting China was key to Mr Trump's successful appeal to working-class and middle-class Americans.

"That's where the anger came from. The working class and the middle class, particularly lower middle class say, 'no, we believe America can return to its former glory'," he said.

"The elites in our country, just like the elites in Australia, said the rise of China is inexorable. It's the second law of thermodynamics. It's part of the physical universe.

"You know what Trump said? 'I don't think so'."

According to Mr Bannon, President Trump is prepared for significant further escalation in his confrontation with China, saying the President is prepared to go "all the way".

"We're in an economic war with China," he said.

The US recently imposed a further $16 billion of tariffs on Chinese imports, which came on the back of $34 billion worth of tariffs implemented in July and an equivalent response from Beijing.

Accounting firm KPMG has warned further deterioration between the two countries into a full-blown trade war could trigger a global recession, with a contraction of Australia's GDP of 2.4 per cent over five years.According to Mr Bannon, Mr Trump is prepared for this eventuality in order to achieve a re-ordering of the global supply chain.

"Recessions come and go. I think workers understand and particularly people that back Donald Trump," he said.

"They understand there could be some speed bumps on this and that's what leadership's about."

This is an acknowledgement from Mr Trump's backers that there could be a high price to pay for the President's economic policies amongst his core constituency.

"I think Donald Trump, I think the country's prepared to do what the country has to do. This is about bringing jobs back and high value-added jobs that bring worth and dignity to workers and they can actually have one income that maybe will support a family," he said.

Australia ripe for working-class revolt

Mr Bannon has continued to campaign for Mr Trump's economic nationalist message in the US and overseas, despite the relationship between the two men souring.

He played a key role in Britain's Brexit campaign and has also forged links with right and left-wing nationalist groups across Europe. He now plans on bringing his crusade to Australia before the next federal election.

"There's a lot of anger out there and I think that this anger can be harnessed," he said.

He says Australia is ripe for the same working-class revolt.

"Australia is going to be a hotbed of populism. Just knowing that cussedness and grit of the Australian people," he said.

Mr Bannon stepped down as executive chairman of the conservative Breitbart News Network earlier this year.

Both Mr Bannon and Breitbart have been accused of stoking racial divisions in America.

But he rejects the idea his economic nationalist ideology is racist.

"The white workers in this country are not racist. The workers in this country are finally standing up for themselves," he said.

"And it doesn't matter how many liberal journalists come in here and say, 'oh, this is a bunch of fascists, this is a bunch of Nazis, this is a bunch of racists'. This movement is not going to stop."

Watch Populist Revolution: Steve Bannon's new world disorder, tonight on Four Corners at 8.30pm on ABC TV and ABC iview.

Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79532
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Sep 2018 at 10:37am
What is his answer Isaac? 
Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79532
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Sep 2018 at 10:39am
And is there actually a problem?

The world decided to stand up to China economically through the TPP. His boy Trump blew that up on his advice. So what is HIS solution?
Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Sep 2018 at 11:01am

Every place you go, you are being watched': reporting from Xi's China

The Guardian’s outgoing Beijing correspondent reflects on six years of increasing repression“Y

ou don’t work out, do you?” inquired one of the officers who had summoned me to my hotel lobby in China’s pre-eminent police state. We had only checked in 10 minutes earlier and, after an exhausting week reporting along Xinjiang’s spectacular high-altitude border with Pakistan, I was desperate for a hot shower and a snooze.

But “Mike” and his partner “Max” – two Uighur police officers tasked with thwarting even the slightest hint of hostile foreign journalism in this ever more repressive region of western China – were insistent. 

Could I pop down for a chat? 

Over afternoon tea in the lobby of Kashgar’s Radisson Blu, we pondered my spindly, gym-deprived physique and Mike’s love of Flamenco music and his impeccable American English. White armoured personnel carriers trundled past the hotel’s fortified entrance and, finally, we came to the point.

Without the express permission of local authorities, reporting was strictly forbidden in these troubled parts, Mike informed me. Not only did I lack biceps, it seemed, but I lacked that too.

That warning delivered, we ended our meeting with forced smiles and needlessly firm handshakes. “You are being watched,” one passerby later whispered into my ear after observing my bizarre hotel lobby date with Mike and Max. “Every call you make. Every place you go.”

Covering China’s slide back towards one-man rule has been an unnerving and, at times, surreal mission. 

Advertisement

Since I touched down here in the summer of 2012 the political climate has soured dramatically with the rise of Xi Jinping, a strongman leader so powerful some call him the “chairman of everything”. 

So too has the experience of reporting here, particularly for those of us tasked with documenting the human cost of China’s authoritarian tack. 

Kicking off his second term last October with a speech from which foreign “troublemakers” including the Guardian, the New York Times and the BBC were barred, Xi encouraged reporters to roam far and wide across China: “It is better to see once than to hear a hundred times.”n reality, many correspondents face increasing enmity and intimidation, although conditions remain far freer than during the darkest periods of contemporary Chinese history when even speaking to locals was impossible.

The poisonous atmosphere was obvious in July 2015 when I attempted to visit the Beijing home of Xu Yonghai, an underground preacher and human rights activist, for a Guardian project on the persecution of Christians around the world. 

Days earlier, security forces had launched a now notorious “war on law” crackdown on human rights lawyers, rounding up hundreds of attorneys and activists, some of whom have yet to emerge from secret detention and have, supporters claim, been brutally tortured. 

Within seconds of arriving outside the pastor’s building, we were intercepted by agents and ordered into a cramped shed equipped with CCTV equipment that was apparently being used to keep tabs on Xu. 

A few days later, after Xu had been forced to travel to the Guardian’s bureau to be interviewed, I described the experience in an email to Beijing’s Foreign Correspondents’ Club, which monitors and compiles increasingly bleak annual reports on reporting conditions.

“We were held in a small room by three men – one a uniformed cop, the other two in civilian clothes – with a large stick on the table beside us. It was unpleasant,” I wrote, explaining how we had eventually been freed after I called China’s foreign ministry and asked them to intervene.

“The man in police uniform at one point grinned at me and said: ‘You know as well as I do what is going on here’.” As the weeks and months went by, and Xi’s crackdown intensified, sucking in academics, novelists, feminists, foreign activists and even booksellers from Hong Kong, it was indeed becoming more and more obvious what was going on – and it was not a pretty sight.

In December 2015 I was among a crowd of foreign journalists and diplomats physically driven from outside a Beijing courthouse by scores of police officers and plainclothes agents set on suppressing reporting of the trial of Pu Zhiqiang, a champion of free speech.

“We hope for change. We must change,” one of Pu’s friends told me just before an Australian colleague was hurled to the ground by an agent whose face was hidden behind a white pollution mask.

Amid the repression there have been moments of laughter and joy.

In May 2016, after sneaking into the back room of a cafe in west Beijing to interview the heavily monitored wives of two incarcerated lawyers, I made the mistake of asking one of them what she most missed about her partner. 

“When they take your lover away, what do you think you most miss?” Wang Qiaoling replied, roaring with laughter. (It was to be another year before her husband, Li Heping, would emerge from detention, an emaciated shadow of his former self, but free, at least).

Last August we travelled to Tanmen, a South China Sea fishing community Xi had visited on one of his first presidential visits. 

Our plan was to interview locals who had met China’s leader four years earlier, and as we walked into the office of Ding Zhile, the head of Tanmen’s fisherman’s association and one of Xi’s hosts, we seemed to have the perfect guy. A copy of one of Xi’s now numerous books, The Governance of China, occupied pride of place on Ding’s desk. A photograph of Xi standing just metres from where we now stood hung just inside the door.Ding, however, was in no mood to talk. “The way I see things, the Guardian is not a good newspaper,” he scowled.

Could he spare just five minutes to describe his afternoon with Chairman Xi? Not a chance. “Please put yourself in my shoes,” Ding grumbled, pointing to the door.

Ding’s dislike of the Guardian’s coverage of Xi’s China has, I sense, been shared by Chinese authorities who have complained repeatedly of the “bad atmosphere” my stories have created. In my six years here, state media, from whom Xi has demanded “absolute loyalty”, have called me a reckless gossip fiend, an unscientific barbarian, an arrogant rumour-monger and, just last month, a sharply voiced up-to-no-good attacker.

Those insults pale into insignificance compared with the growing restrictions and threats faced by Chinese journalists, the subject of one of the most dispiriting reports of my time in Beijing.

But they do, I think, shed some light on the dramatic and troubling changes now sweeping the world’s wealthiest and most powerful authoritarian nation and on the Communist party’s deep unease and anger at the outsiders attempting to chronicle them. 

When I informed my government handler I had been appointed the Guardian’s Latin America correspondent and would soon be moving to Mexico City, he offered his congratulations. “That’s a ... mysterious land,” he said. “Remote and far!” 

Alas, when it comes to this unscientific barbarian, I suspect even Mexico may not be quite far enough.

Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79532
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Sep 2018 at 11:12am
Errrm, you are watched monitored and tracked everywhere you go in Australia, or the US or Kenya if you own a smartphone credit/debit card or walk anywhere near a CC tv or a car with dash-cam.
Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79532
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03 Sep 2018 at 2:09pm
Not outraged Isaac? Maybe you think it should be blocked here as well?


China officially bans ABC website, claims internet is 'fully open'

By China correspondents Matthew Carney and Bill Birtles in Beijin

China's cyber security regulator has confirmed it has censored the ABC's website for breaching the country's internet rules and regulations, but has declined to say how.

Key points:

  • Access to the ABC website in China was abruptly stopped on August 22
  • It comes about a year after the ABC began running a new Chinese language service
  • Chinese censors routinely block some international websites such as the Chinese language versions of the New York Times and BBC

The ABC's website and apps are usually accessible to Chinese web users and are not subject to the "Great Firewall" of censorship, but access was abruptly stopped on August 22.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-03/china-officially-bans-abc-website/10193158

Back to Top
Gay3 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Location: Miners Rest
Status: Offline
Points: 51994
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gay3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 2018 at 8:39pm

China Wolfs Down Southeast Asia’s Wildlife

3201

By: Gregory McCann

There is a monster chewing its way through the wildlife of its smaller, weaker Southeast Asian neighbors. The monster can change forms—like a shape-shifter—but it goes by one name: China. The region’s wildlife is rapidly disappearing, being sucked into the vortex of the illegal wildlife trade that leads to China.

In the Burmese border town of Mong-La, everything from tree-dwelling civets to clouded leopards, from tiger claws to elephant skin, and from pangolin scales to bear gall bladder is on sale, with the vast majority of customers coming over the border from Yunnan. National Geographic just this month ran a stunning if disturbing article on the plight of the “dinosaur of the skies”—the majestic Helmeted Hornbill.

The Hornbills’ numbers are crashing and in a few short years have been downgraded from Vulnerable to Critically Endangered by the IUCN. The Chinese are after their heads, literally. Their solid red casques are considered “red ivory” They are actually made of keratin, the same stuff as your fingernails and, incidentally, rhino horn, and rhinoceros are another species which have been virtually wiped off the face of the Southeast Asian map thanks to a misplaced belief that ground rhino horn can cure cancer and a host of other human ailments.

So dire is the situation of the Helmeted Hornbill that governments in this species range (Indonesia, Malaysia, Brunei, Thailand, and Myanmar) have recently formed a joint management and conservation plan to attempt to ensure that this otherworldly bird has a future outside of China’s markets. Asia Sentinel also published a story specifically about the hornbill hunters of Sumatra last year, and how those hornbill heads are sold to Chinese middlemen in the city of Medan.

Mainland Chinese investors in Singapore and Chinese Singaporeans are buying—mostly illicitly—so much sand from Cambodia’s coastal Koh Kong province that irreparable environmental damage is now becoming manifest. A well-informed source told me that one sand barge was so enormous that it took eight tugboats to pull it to Singapore. Activists from the NGO Mother Nature were arrested after filming illegal sand barges in Cambodia, and some of this group’s members had to flee to Thailand. The removal of riverbed sand—which is prized construction material—annihilates the river’s ecology, decimating fish populations and the wildlife that depends on them, such as river dolphins, otters, and fishing cats. Chinese investors are also behind the recent clearing of mangrove forests in Koh Kong, another nefarious activity that will cause significant environmental degradation.

Chinese developers, backed by Beijing, have begun the initial stages of construction on a highly controversial hydroelectric dam in Sumatra’s Batang Toru forest, which is home to a Critically Endangered population of Sumatran Orangutan, as well as Sumatran tigers and Helmeted Hornbills—all listed by the IUCN as Critically Endangered, with the last two being Critically Endangered largely due to Chinese demand for their carcasses. Now they are all even more endangered as a result of this dam, which will flood prime forest habitat and put the 800 or so orangutans—as well as other species—at immediate risk of extinction (in the case of this sub-species orangutan, which is only found in Batang Toru) and local extinction (for tigers and helmeted hornbills).

Over in Kalimantan in Indonesian Borneo, China Power Investment, a hydroelectric company, is investing US$17 billion in a massive dam project on the Kayan River, a project which will flood primary forest in the Heart of Borneo and put a myriad of wildlife species at risk and will forever change the ecology of this region. Chinese companies are also connected with illegal logging in prime Bornean orangutan habitat in West Kalimantan’s Sungai Putri Landscape, a debacle which has been ongoing for over two years’ now.

The ghastly trade in elephant skins from Myanmar has been driven largely by Chinese demand, as is so often the case for wildlife products from the region, and Burmese timber continues to make its way into Yunnan. Much has already been written about the Chinese enclave in northern Laos where casinos also serve up barbecued tiger, bear, and other protected species. One can only imagine what is being taken out of the surrounding seas and forests in the Chinese enclaves of Sihanoukville and Koh Kong in Cambodia, not to mention the South China Sea.

Mong-La in Myanmar, Botun in Laos, Sihanoukville in Cambodia, and Medan in Sumatra all serve as major conduits—some might even say black holes—for the region’s wildlife into the great Chinese illegal wildlife market (vortex). The “sucking sound” is heard loudly in these places today, just as it always has in Bangkok’s Chinatown and continues to be heard there today.

Sea turtles, sea horses, sea cucumbers, shark fins, yellow-margined box turtles in Taiwan, tiger bones and furs and penis, pangolin scales, rhinoceros horn, elephant skin and ivory, clouded leopard pelts, helmeted hornbill casques, bear bile, deer antlers, red coral, rosewood trees, massive cave-riddled limestone outcrops (which are ancient coral reefs) ground up into construction powder, and even sand itself as mentioned at the beginning…are all being robotically sucked up in the most hideous vortex of greed and ignorance the world has ever known. If it moves, eat it; if it doesn’t move, build with it. That seems to be the Chinese mantra. Use, use, use, until there is nothing left to use anymore.

China is building so many dams on the Mekong River that this great river of the world will likely be rendered unrecognizable in the near future, and its plans for the Brahmaputra, which spills out of Tibet and into India and Bangladesh, and other Himalayan rivers, are just as scary. And it is worth noting that the Brahmaputra runs through India’s world class Kaziranga National Park, and a significant drop in the river levels there could imperil Asia’s largest population of rhinoceros, as well as further endanger tigers, elephants, leopards, and a host of other species that find refuge in Kaziranga.

China is also far and away the biggest polluter of the world’s oceans, dumping many times more plastic into the seas than any other country on the planet. Research carried out in China shows that air pollution there is so bad that it is equivalent to losing a year’s worth of education. Chinese factories are also pumping out massive amounts of the banned ozone-killing chemical CFC-11, threatening to erase over a decade’s progress in repairing damage to the ozone layer caused by this substance.

The planet, apparently, is just a place to trash, with the skies a vast chimney and the oceans the toilet bowls. This is not, of course, an attitude unique to China (though the consumption of exotic wildlife is, with Vietnam in second place), but because of China’s size and rising wealth—and the accompanying desire for more consumer products and other forms of wealth like cars and additional homes—this country’s footprint on the Earth will be gargantuan, and most likely irreparable.

Are there any signs of hope? The Chinese appear to be walking away from a dreadful hydroelectric project in Nepal, and Malaysian PM Mahathir has shut down several key Chinese-backed infrastructure projects in his country that were part of the supposed Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), all of which would have caused environmental damage, would have threatened wildlife, and plunged the country deep into debt. Mahathir also recently made a statement casting doubt on whether “foreigners” (Chinese) would get visas to live in the massive Forest City project in Peninsular Malaysia. More Southeast Asian countries need to carefully scrutinize any BRI projects lest they become “debt traps.” From an environmental perspective, the BRI is just about the worst thing that could possibly happen.

China itself is moving to protect what remains of its intertidal mudflats on the coast of the Yellow Sea, which are vital stopover points for migratory shorebirds. However, in North Korea, which still has vast intact tidal mudflats, Chinese investment threatens—and already is—transforming these into places where migrating birds cannot stopover. The trashing of Tibet continues unabated.

And of course China’s trashing of the natural world isn’t limited to Asia. Jaguars are being slaughtered for their fangs, which are sold as trinkets to Chinese consumers, and this is putting pressure on the largest wild cat of South and Central America.  The vaquita porpoise is down to a dozen individuals in Mexican waters, thanks to Chinese superstitious beliefs in the medicinal use of its swim bladder.

Nearly 100 African elephants were recently found slaughtered in Botswana with their tusks missing, which are probably already in China or Hong Kong, while fleets of government subsidized long-distance fishing vessels scour the Earth’s oceans, plundering the most remote corners and stealing from the exclusive zones of sovereign nations. I could go on, but that’s another article.

Some can argue that we need China’s cooperation, so perhaps it is better not to call the country out the way I have. Cooperation is needed, that’s true. But there is no guarantee that the world going to get it, or at least anywhere near in the amount that is needed, or get any meaningful cooperation at all, for that matter.

What will work? Economic sanctions? Good luck with that. Who has the guts to follow through with the tough sanctions that might force real, meaningful changes in China? Maybe all we can really do is be ecotourists and see what remains before it’s gone.

Nonetheless, fight the good fight. It’s worth fighting, even if the chances of success are slim.

Gregory McCann is the Project Coordinator for Habitat ID and the author of the book Called Away by a Mountain Spirit: Journeys to the Green Corridor. You can find him on Twitter, and you can support his conservation projects in Cambodia and Sumatra here.

Wisdom has been chasing me but I've always outrun it!
Back to Top
Whale View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Location: St Kilda Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 38719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Whale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 2018 at 8:41pm
See where China waived debt for infrastructure they provided in many poor African countries, verycompassionate that
Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79532
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 2018 at 8:50pm
And China and Russia have again extended their assistance to Venezuela this week, as Venezuela tell the Trump delegation to piss off.
Back to Top
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09 Sep 2018 at 10:32pm
Originally posted by Passing Through Passing Through wrote:

Not outraged Isaac? Maybe you think it should be blocked here as well?


China officially bans ABC website, claims internet is 'fully open'

By China correspondents Matthew Carney and Bill Birtles in Beijin

China's cyber security regulator has confirmed it has censored the ABC's website for breaching the country's internet rules and regulations, but has declined to say how.

Key points:

  • Access to the ABC website in China was abruptly stopped on August 22
  • It comes about a year after the ABC began running a new Chinese language service
  • Chinese censors routinely block some international websites such as the Chinese language versions of the New York Times and BBC

The ABC's website and apps are usually accessible to Chinese web users and are not subject to the "Great Firewall" of censorship, but access was abruptly stopped on August 22.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-09-03/china-officially-bans-abc-website/10193158


Why can't we have that!Angry
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 1819202122 66>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.156 seconds.