Go to Villagebet.com.au for free horse racing tips - Click here now |
|
THE POSTAL VOTE/POLL |
Post Reply | Page <1 5758596061 158> |
Author | |||||||||
Redemption
Champion Joined: 09 Apr 2017 Location: Melbourne Status: Offline Points: 5387 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
F#uck you bullies
Bullying is way way way worse that bloody voting no. Bullying is killing people. Go get stuffed.
|
|||||||||
max manewer
Champion Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Status: Offline Points: 32947 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
Get into 'em redempsey ! So which way are we voting now ?
|
|||||||||
cabosanlucas
Champion Joined: 15 Jun 2013 Status: Offline Points: 7363 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
onya redempsey! đ |
|||||||||
Whale
Champion Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Location: St Kilda Beach Status: Offline Points: 38719 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
go and bomb North Korea |
|||||||||
Tlazolteotl
Champion Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Location: Elephant Butte Status: Offline Points: 31416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
Jeez what a shock.
|
|||||||||
Second Chance
Champion Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Status: Online Points: 45716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
Interestingly I agree with Redemption to a significant degree.
Bullying of any kind in this context is worse imo than voting in any way at all, be it yes, no or "informal".
|
|||||||||
cabosanlucas
Champion Joined: 15 Jun 2013 Status: Offline Points: 7363 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
here's two comments from page 1 on the marr article.
1. Thank goodness that a prominent supporter of SSM has had the guts to finally say this. progressives should own this sentiment proudly, not be mealymouthed about the broader social change we hope SSM is part of and will further. This is about undermining entrenched forms of marginalisation and prejudice in relation to LGBTQ folks. I hope that some version of teaching Safe Schools willfollow. This is not just about marriage and marriage alone, this is about taking on unreasoned bigotry and changing Australian society for the better. 2. Personally, I've got a whole shopping list of stuff I'd love to follow from this. Perhaps less taxpayer dosh spent gilding Catholic schools etc.? It'd also be great to see churches lose charity status, massive tax concessions etc. yeah...slippery slope is a myth. |
|||||||||
Dr E
Champion Joined: 05 Feb 2013 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 28563 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
E&E ... that is a stupid statement to start with, and of course, NOT what Whale was arguing with me ... if it was, he didn't realise it! He was arguing that the structure of a company determined whether the receivables/debts could be sold ... which is of course wrong. However, if a shareholder is dissatisfied with any of the terms of a sale, say he felt the value of an asset was not taken into proper account, he is entitled to apply for an injunction if he feels that he has legal grounds to argue ... roll on the ground laughing about that if you like |
|||||||||
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
|
|||||||||
cabosanlucas
Champion Joined: 15 Jun 2013 Status: Offline Points: 7363 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
marxist ratbaggery 101 -
the đłď¸âđwavers are calling on a boycott of woolworths over comments made by someone who left the company 10 years ago. |
|||||||||
oneonesit
Champion Joined: 06 Aug 2012 Status: Online Points: 37159 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
Refer ALP Election Promises
|
|||||||||
Second Chance
Champion Joined: 02 Dec 2007 Status: Online Points: 45716 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
Would have to agree.
Why carry all this stuff forward, post after post?
|
|||||||||
max manewer
Champion Joined: 31 Jan 2010 Status: Offline Points: 32947 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
Woolworths seems to have some dopey management, first the Masters debacle, now falling over themselves to get involved in a divisive campaign. That won't increase business. |
|||||||||
Whale
Champion Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Location: St Kilda Beach Status: Offline Points: 38719 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
happy to roll around the floor laughing with the rest of the board members. [/QUOTE] E&E ... that is a stupid statement to start with, and of course, NOT what Whale was arguing with me ... if it was, he didn't realise it! He was arguing that the structure of a company determined whether the receivables/debts could be sold ... which is of course wrong. However, if a shareholder is dissatisfied with any of the terms of a sale, say he felt the value of an asset was not taken into proper account, he is entitled to apply for an injunction if he feels that he has legal grounds to argue ... roll on the ground laughing about that if you like wrong and I was basically correcting Max's ignorant assertion that the debts of the corner business must have been sold to the new owner I see you are lying again, it is a NO vote or a no vote for you, that is the only thing you are undecided about |
|||||||||
stayer
Champion Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Status: Offline Points: 21897 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
Yep. |
|||||||||
maccamax
Champion Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Status: Offline Points: 41473 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
I know you are going to vote NO . You show too much sense to vote otherwise. Besides , You wouldn't like to see me in the hands of some Ravenous Male would you. |
|||||||||
stayer
Champion Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Status: Offline Points: 21897 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
stayer
Champion Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Status: Offline Points: 21897 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
again. (Sorry just skimming through) |
|||||||||
stayer
Champion Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Status: Offline Points: 21897 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
No it was originally a disparaging term by fellow marxists. |
|||||||||
stayer
Champion Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Status: Offline Points: 21897 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
|
|||||||||
stayer
Champion Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Status: Offline Points: 21897 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
You mean catholics? |
|||||||||
Tlazolteotl
Champion Joined: 02 Oct 2012 Location: Elephant Butte Status: Offline Points: 31416 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
OriginThe term âcultural Marxismâ is believed to have been coined by American sociology professor Trent Schroyer in his 1973 The Critique of Domination: The Origins and Development of Critical Theory, in which the author identifies the Frankfurt Schoolâs critical theory, a school of thought focusing on reflective assessment and cultural critique through application of social sciences, as the origin of a âculture industryâ that imposes âsocially unnecessary constraints of human freedomâ and ultimately, the social domination of the individual.
In the following decades, Schroyerâs critique of the Frankfurt School as the origin of postwar liberal agendas and destruction of individualism was further expounded upon by other mainstream academics, most notably Richard Weinerâs Cultural Marxism and Political Sociology (1981) and Michael Minnicinoâs New Dark Age: Frankfurt School and âPolitical Correctnessâ (1992). < allowfullscreen="true" scrolling="no" style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border-width: initial; border-style: none; outline: 0px; font-size: 10px; vertical-align: line; -: initial; -: initial; -size: initial; -repeat: initial; -attachment: initial; -origin: initial; -clip: initial; clear: both; display: block; text-align: center; max-width: 100%; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, Verdana, sans-serif; overflow: ; width: 0px; height: 49px; visibility: !imant; min-width: 150px !imant; min-height: 25px !imant;">SpreadHowever, during the late 1990s, the meaning behind âcultural Marxismâ became increasingly diluted and detached from its original context as many right-wing and neoconservative commentators, such as William S. Lind and Pat Buchanan, began using the term as a catch-all for left-wing cultural criticism in their commentaries. During the first half of the 2000s, this trend continued to gradually spread across other conservative think tanks, most notably the Schiller Institute. http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/cultural-marxism |
|||||||||
Whale
Champion Joined: 01 Jun 2009 Location: St Kilda Beach Status: Offline Points: 38719 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
Pascal's Wager |
|||||||||
stayer
Champion Joined: 10 Aug 2010 Status: Offline Points: 21897 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
cabosanlucas
Champion Joined: 15 Jun 2013 Status: Offline Points: 7363 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
Dr E
Champion Joined: 05 Feb 2013 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 28563 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
for continuity of message.
|
|||||||||
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
|
|||||||||
Dr E
Champion Joined: 05 Feb 2013 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 28563 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
[[/QUOTE]
I fear this post could end up even longer then E&E's post in the NRL thread [/QUOTE]
Hahaha! ... no, don't worry, I'm not giving Whale anymore free legal advice!
|
|||||||||
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
|
|||||||||
Dr E
Champion Joined: 05 Feb 2013 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 28563 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
^ ... see what I mean Second Chance ... makes no sense does it?
|
|||||||||
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
|
|||||||||
Dr E
Champion Joined: 05 Feb 2013 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 28563 |
Post Options
Thanks(1)
|
||||||||
E&E ... that is a stupid statement to start with, and of course, NOT what Whale was arguing with me ... if it was, he didn't realise it! He was arguing that the structure of a company determined whether the receivables/debts could be sold ... which is of course wrong. However, if a shareholder is dissatisfied with any of the terms of a sale, say he felt the value of an asset was not taken into proper account, he is entitled to apply for an injunction if he feels that he has legal grounds to argue ... roll on the ground laughing about that if you like wrong and I was basically correcting Max's ignorant assertion that the debts of the corner business must have been sold to the new owner I see you are lying again, it is a NO vote or a no vote for you, that is the only thing you are undecided about [/QUOTE] |
|||||||||
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
|
|||||||||
maccamax
Champion Joined: 19 Jun 2010 Status: Offline Points: 41473 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
Whale has been wounded. . So show pity.
He is suffering the price for deserting the ship in favour of PT's chip on shoulder re Donald Trump POTUS> Things will get worse as their previous victim ( Terrific Tony Abbott )) is on the comeback trail. ( later this year a spill ) Surprisingly , the numbers have changed dramatically in his favour. A bigger shock is the nose dive in the YES vote popularity. Poll. Still hot fav. with the bookies though. $1.35 = $3.00 |
|||||||||
Dr E
Champion Joined: 05 Feb 2013 Location: Australia Status: Offline Points: 28563 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
|
||||||||
macca, you and i and those who have taken notice, know that the SSM debate has been hijacked by the militant extremists of the left ... and now the the rest of the community is just starting to realise it.
They can now see evidence of that every night on the news (even on Channel 2!) and understand that a YES vote is a reward for arrogance, intolerance, bigotry, and hate speech against the majority of the population ... and accordingly many who were originally going with the flow, have had enough of the gelati from the freaks and geeks (and those who have sadly been brain washed) and are now simply arching up against the Marxists, and are at least undecided if not NO. What these unhinged out of touch ratbags forget is that the law is what it is, the onus is on THEM to make an argument to change the law, it is most certainly NOT a right.
|
|||||||||
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
|
|||||||||
Post Reply | Page <1 5758596061 158> |
Tweet |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |