Go to Villagebet.com.au for free horse racing tips - Click here now
Forum Home Forum Home > All Sports - Public Forums > Joffs All Sports Bar
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Reject the ALP, Marxism and Anarchy
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Thoroughbred Village Home Page. For village news, follow @TBVillage on Twitter. For horseracing tips, follow @Villagebet on Twitter. To contact the Mayor by email: Click Here.


Reject the ALP, Marxism and Anarchy

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 58>
Author
Message
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Reject the ALP, Marxism and Anarchy
    Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 3:14pm
Well, if Roz (what tf is it!?) Ward, Marxist LGBTIQRSTUV bully and "groomer", the ALP Leader's puppeteer in Victoria didn't convince you, new ACTU president, Long Tall Sally McManeater, Bullgelati Bill's latest handler, has certainly made it an easy decision for anyone who believes in the social and democratic ideals that underpin the Australian way of life!
This anarchic feminist - you know a woman who hates herself as much as she hates men, and then picks fights with everyone, but doesn't believe she should be held to account by Australian laws - is the archetypal new age socialist. 

Androgynous (a sure giveaway for a natural self loathing fugly), and irrelevant in normal society, these are the people who can't live one day without being offended about something that normal people didn't even notice. They are the ones who want to take you to court for having a laugh, but encourage their own kind to break the laws of the land?

Haven't heard her comment on Radical Islamic Terrorism, and I doubt we ever will, assuming that she only watches the ABC and reads Fairfax news, she would not even be aware that there are Muslims in Australia other than the Muslims of convenience like Sam and Waleed, since there are none in leafy Paddington - not even serving chai lattes and Paleo banana bread in the hipster cafes!!!

Time to push back hard folks, reject these out of touch lunatics, before it's compulsory homosexuality and Sharia Law only.Dead

Check out Roz Ward and Sally McManus ... you could easily mistake them for brothers!

This is "shim"

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/not-so-safe-roz-ward-attacks-trump-supporter/news-story/30a6bc421961222662d8bb9a13a8d963
 
and this is "shim" too!

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-03-15/actu-boss-happy-for-workers-to-break-unjust-laws/8357698

In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
cabosanlucas View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 15 Jun 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 7363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cabosanlucas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 3:41pm
She opened herself up to cop a serve re disobeying the law...but civil disobedience has a long history of causing change for the better. many examples.

she wasnt talking about murder, just industrial action. banks break the law, why cant unions?

She sounds like a little fighter, not afraid to tell it straight.

alas, i dont know her social position or activism. if she strays from union work and starts ranting and raving about identity politics she wont help. wayne swan certainly knows the pitfalls of ramming social progressive topics down peoples throats. in his words, he said the alp "will be straight out the backdoor" if that dominates over more common, inclusive policies or goals.
Back to Top
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 4:04pm
cabo you old anarchist you! ... I doubt you would agree with this ... I know maccamax wont!

ACTU chief Sally McManus wants big boob ban - looking good is a symbol of ♂ oppressing ♀


http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2017/03/actu-chief-sally-mcmanus-wants-big-boob-ban-looking-good-is-a-symbol-of-oppressing-.html
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 4:07pm
Yep, Penny Wong will be the next ALP leader ... as soon as she grows some balls, puts her big lesbian pants on, and starts saying what she thinks!Pinch
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79533
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 4:10pm
Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79533
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 4:13pm
Wasn't the Murdoch media also in a bit of strife not too long ago in Britain for some issues regarding rule of law? I can't remember the details.Wink
Back to Top
Whale View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Location: St Kilda Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 38719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Whale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 4:22pm
Dr E you really are a revolting "human being'.

yes i know you try to be as provocative as you can but still the language you use to describe anyone you disagree with is sick , hateful vomit based on true feelings.

Do us all a favour and leave TBV
Back to Top
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 4:36pm
Since you asked so nicely Whale, and with such sincerity and from your position of innocence ... LOL
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
Whale View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Location: St Kilda Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 38719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Whale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 4:38pm
thank you, goodbye
Back to Top
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 4:47pm
I'm baaaaack!LOL

Whale, it's a free world ... at least whilst we keep the socialists at bay ... so, I'll keep calling 'em like I see 'em, and you can keep on defending these unhinged, reprehensible, UnAstralian vermin who would undermine our way of life!Wink
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
cabosanlucas View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 15 Jun 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 7363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cabosanlucas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:09pm
Originally posted by Dr E Dr E wrote:

cabo you old anarchist you! ... I doubt you would agree with this ... I know maccamax wont!

<h2 ="entry-er font-entryer" style="-sizing: border-; font-family: Alice; font-weight: 500; margin: 0px; visibility: ; padding: 0px 0px 5px; line-height: 30px !imant; font-size: 30px !imant;"><span ="entry-title" style="-sizing: border-;">ACTU chief Sally McManus wants big boob ban - looking good is a symbol of ♂ oppressing ♀</span></h2>

http://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2017/03/actu-chief-sally-mcmanus-wants-big-boob-ban-looking-good-is-a-symbol-of-oppressing-.html



Oh no...why did i watch ...

yet the burqa doesnt rate. solariums are more patriarchal than burqa's. Oh fiddlesticks. silly sally ....

stick to unions and she will be sunshine sally.
Back to Top
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:14pm
Sorry cabo, she's just another one of those feminatzis who thinks the sun shines out of her vagina ... see Madonna, Ashley Judd, Rosie O'Donnell, etc, etc ... the future of socialism!Dead
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
waggamick View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 19 Aug 2007
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 7140
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote waggamick Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:18pm
..........before it's compulsory homosexuality and Sharia Law only.

That makes sense!Wacko
The Dude Abides
Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79533
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:25pm
What was the context of that p*sstake and the other 4 speakers around her Doc?
Back to Top
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:27pm
It would be funny if it were not true that she ranks as the No 1 oppressive thing for women that she wants to ban is "the mutilation caused by boob jobs", yet does not consider "banning the Burka" in the top 10 - the symbol of Islamic male dominance, in a religion where men impose their oppression by encouraging female genital mutilation.

... out of touch, unhinged, self loathing psycho, or just another ABC viewer who has NFI and now runs the ALP ... BOTH!Wacko
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:29pm
Originally posted by waggamick waggamick wrote:

..........before it's compulsory homosexuality and Sharia Law only.

That makes sense!Wacko

Just another example of the hypocrisy of the left, what more can we say!? ... Wacko agreed!
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79533
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:33pm
Doesn't take much to outrage you does it Doc?
Back to Top
Phazeal View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 847
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Phazeal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:49pm
Dr E
 
I have kept away from discussions and debates on TBV for several months because - whether you like it or relish it - of you.
 
There are several threads in the Joffs area that are terribly hard to get a good discussion, debate, or even heated argument with the other side without it descending into namecalling and ridicule. However, while everybody that regularly participates in these discussion puts a toe over the line on occasion and reins it back enough to allow the thread to generally resume a course of reasonable (if still heated) debate, every time you enter the room you single-handedly - and almost always lone-gun - come over the top with an incredibly incendiary post of demeaning literally everybody you disagree with, and everybody who represents them.
 
I spent a couple of hours killing time yesterday catching up on some reading on several of these threads on the Joffs part of this Village, and having been out of the loop for a while and cramming it all in at once I was amazed at how often, in a thread on very sensitive subjects, you exclusively and with no help from anybody else take issues that people from vastly different parts of the political spectrum are doing their best to debate with a general level of decorum and immediately drag them down to a level of schoolyard namecalling, demeaning language towards all who would disagree with you (both those who are published and even those who may dare to question you on the thread in the future), demean and despise all who represent at least half of the population of this country, and refuse to involve yourself in anything resembling a discussion on the issues. Rather, seeming to follow the 'if I yell loud enough, long enough, bully enough, frequency enough, ignore facts enough, contradict enough, close down enough, that you will somehow 'win' a thread and become king of the thread.
 
Why? Dr E, I don't consider you evil, I don't even believe half the things you say, because some of the time you completely contradict yourself. But why do you insist on poisoning every single thread you participate in the Joffs section of this Forum with your vitriole?
 
I have spoken to you at length in private about several issues - including some that might affect your livelihood - and know for a fact that you are capable of not only having a high quality conversation about these subjects but are even polite and welcoming for the opportunity to express your opinions about them in a concise, unoffending manner.
 
I object to the way you talk about some of our politicians. I like Penny Wong, and not just because she leads a party on the same of the fence as me, but also because she is a reasonable politician. I find it grossly offensive that you would talk about her 'putting her big lesbian pants on'. I find that distasteful, it does nothing for the conversation, it does nothing for you, it does nothing for us, nor any of the people who also don't like her much. It just draws the level of debate down to a level that I really don't think anybody on this site except You appreciate. I'm not saying everybody here is a choir boy (girl, etc), but seriously Dr E, in my reading of these threads over the last 24 hours you have not slowed down since I grew tired of having you hijack threads before Christmas. Others cross the line but they always rein it in. But every time I have been reading through these threads thinking I am moving into some serious discussion about a topic, you post, and your posts drag everybody back down into the quagmire of namecalling and oneupmanship.
 
Is there any possible hope, Dr E, that you could rein it in? I mean permanently? There are so many people on here from the 'other side' (regardless of which side that is) that people from the 'opposite side' (regardless of which side THAT is) would really like to hear from, but Dr E, you are NOT providing 'balance'. You are poisoning the waters of discourse that everybody else is trying to navigate through except you.
 
Please consider what I've said, Dr E. Your posts ruin literally every single discussion you insert them into due to a behaviour that isn't really indicative of your own personal demeanour. Please for the sake of rational discussion, tone down your posts. Everybody goes into grey areas, but you are the only one out on the limb taking it all to the nth degree.
 
thanks mate.
 
Phaz
 
P.S. For what it's worth, your thread title is wrong. Anarchy is far, far right wing.
Back to Top
Second Chance View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 45116
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Second Chance Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:56pm
Phaz I hesitate to say this, but you will  lost Dr E as soon as he realised you'd written more than a couple of sentences.  So don't expect any kind of cogent reply.
Back to Top
Second Chance View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 02 Dec 2007
Status: Offline
Points: 45116
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Second Chance Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 5:59pm
...will have lost...
Back to Top
cabosanlucas View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 15 Jun 2013
Status: Offline
Points: 7363
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote cabosanlucas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 6:05pm
18c .

doc is a different style with colorful language...but i still read and have a laugh. i take most of it as tongue in cheek... like old macca. doc said previously he overstates for effect. in other words...taking the piddle. but i see some salient points in amongst it at times.

their is plenty of lunatics out there with moderate, diplomatic writing. each to their own. give as good as you get.
Back to Top
stayer View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 21886
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stayer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 6:16pm
Stating what I hope is the obvious - Dr E obviously plays a role of being as un-pc as possible, deliberately being provocative etc. It's 80% of the point of every post he makes about these things. How people take any of it literally, rather than as satirical, I don't understand. Playing the fool to show up others is as old as the hills.
Having said that, I think this thread is useless and should be closed because it won't lead to anything good - especially if some people respond to his p*ss taking as if he's being totally serious.
Back to Top
Passing Through View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 09 Jan 2013
Location: At home
Status: Offline
Points: 79533
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Passing Through Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 6:18pm
I dont think anyone takes him literally
Back to Top
Whale View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Location: St Kilda Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 38719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Whale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 6:21pm
True but he still annoys the fcuk out of most Ouch

He would be happy to know that
Back to Top
stayer View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 21886
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stayer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 6:23pm
Originally posted by Passing Through Passing Through wrote:

I dont think anyone takes him literally

Whale certainly seems to a lot of the time.
Back to Top
Whale View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Location: St Kilda Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 38719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Whale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 6:26pm
no not literally, what annoys me is his obvious provocation to get a reaction, and repeats it 1000 times.

also serious or not, the terms he uses to describe minorities are disgusting, free speech ,but I don't have to like it
Back to Top
stayer View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 21886
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stayer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 6:31pm
Originally posted by Whale Whale wrote:

no not literally, what annoys me is his obvious provocation to get a reaction, and repeats it 1000 times.

also serious or not, the terms he uses to describe minorities are disgusting, free speech ,but I don't have to like it

Yeah but you can still see it as satire, rather than calling him a revolting human being etc. That's just stoopid.
Back to Top
Whale View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Location: St Kilda Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 38719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Whale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 6:42pm
satire ? now that is funny. satire is meant to be clever.  and yes anyone who describes minorities as he does, tongue in cheek or not, is a revolting human being.
Back to Top
stayer View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 10 Aug 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 21886
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote stayer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 6:46pm
Anyway the thread title doesn't even make sense.   
Back to Top
Afros View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 14 Jan 2009
Status: Offline
Points: 15165
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Afros Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17 Mar 2017 at 9:06pm
I don't know why anyone takes Dr Rightard seriously? How can you take a man who is unable to use uniform formatting across a post seriously?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123 58>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.