Go to Villagebet.com.au for free horse racing tips - Click here now
Forum Home Forum Home > All Sports - Public Forums > Joffs All Sports Bar
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Northern territory prison brutalisation
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Thoroughbred Village Home Page. For village news, follow @TBVillage on Twitter. For horseracing tips, follow @Villagebet on Twitter. To contact the Mayor by email: Click Here.


Northern territory prison brutalisation

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 20>
Author
Message
Rattlesnake View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 705
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rattlesnake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 10:53am
Originally posted by 3blindmice 3blindmice wrote:

Originally posted by Rattlesnake Rattlesnake wrote:



Unfortunately it doesn't seem as though some people are able to respond to points being made, they just skip over what's uncomfortable for them to address.

What subastral is asking for correctional staff to do in the case of stripping the inmate of their clothing and give them detention center issued clothing, is ignore procedure and burden themselves with personal risk.

If a staff member knew of a self harm threat, did not follow procedure, and the inmate ended up injuring or killing themselves with their own clothing, possible criminal and civil cases could be brought.

The fact the the inmate was 11 is irrelevant. The procedure was in place at a juvenile detention center, which means the procedure was meant to be applied to young people.

The ABC lead with the footage and photographs of the hooding and wrist restraints as it's cleary the most provocative, and yet that situation is probably the easiest to explain out of all the 'abuse.'

No one who first saw the images or footage as abuse is yet to give any reply to those who have explained in what situations hoods and wrist restraints are used. Again, it's just skipped over because it's been explained in a rational manner that doesn't fit the initial emotional response.

Your ability to blame the victim and rationalise obvious abhorrent behaviour and "procedure" is legendary although it comes with the territory so we shouldn't be surprised. The fact that Turnbull and Brandis would implement a RC suggest even your con pals think this sort of treatment of offenders - particularly young offenders - is grossly inappropriate. It appears you support stripping people of their clothing as a measure to prevent self-harm. Interesting insight into your character for those who haven't already worked it out.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Here is the August 2015 report by the commissioner into the 2014 gassing at Don Dale centre.

Among its findings, the report says the extended use of solitary confinement “was inappropriate and did not comply with the Youth Justice Act”.

It found the six youths had been held there between six and 17 days. The maximum under the Act is 72 hours (three days).

It also found that the department’s version of events used to justify the use of tear gas was “inaccurate and misleading”.

Bath’s investigation noted that two children playing cards in their cell were also punished alongside the key perpetrator. They were gassed and transferred to the adult prison – in contravention of the Act – with “spit hoods” on. That footage was seen on Four Corners last night.

.....It’s not the first time Dr Bath has tried to raise the alarm. He also wrote a still suppressed 2012 report into the systematic abuse of Dylan Voller, 18, who has been repeatedly institutionalised since age 12. The Northern Territory government has not released the report.

http://www.businessinsider.com.au/the-truly-shocking-thing-about-the-nts-juvenile-detention-abuse-is-how-many-times-the-alarm-was-raised-and-ignored-2016-7


Use of solitary confinement above and beyond what the Act allows is obviously wrong and would need to be addressed.

I never said that everything done was correct.

What I have done is provide examples of why certain actions are taken.

IMO being automatically shocked at seeing a 17 year old with a hood on and in wrist restraints without arming yourself with the knowledge of why those measures are taken is pure ignorance.

If it comes down to the rights of a violent criminal being allowed to spit on an employee, or the rights of an employee being able to work without being spat on and waiting 3 months to find out whether they have contracted a communicable disease, I'll be supporting the employee's rights.

The violent criminal has taken the personal choice to spit on an employee, these actions have consequences.

Regarding people who have threatened self harm, stripping people of their clothing and providing prison issued clothing saves lives. It's common practice.

Maybe you should try looking into research done regarding the most frequent self harm methods tried in custody (strangulation and hanging with clothing and accessories) before passing judgement.

Socks, underwear, shirts, pants. It's not just belts and shoe laces. 

If these procedures weren't in place, or were ignored, and an increase in Police custody suicides was seen, people would be ranting and raving about why policies aren't in place to remove the items used in the suicides.
Back to Top
Rattlesnake View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 705
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rattlesnake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 11:28am
Originally posted by maccamax maccamax wrote:

 3 Blind Mice.       Truly , you have no idea of the environment and the difficulties involved in the every day management of incorrigible people.
     You saw nothing on 4Corners .     On the scale of 1 to 10 ,   you saw 1.
All of these inmates are there for very good reason .     In the main to try and keep the community safe .
   Do gooders  scream now but Much louder when they become a victim of these criminals.
 
   These teens serve their apprenticeship in areas like 4 corners filmed.  AND their coming to a place near you.
 
FYI .    Clothes are stripped from these people so they cant use the materials to strip and hang themselves from (say) a door knob.        So they cant eat them , choke themselves with them.
   The restraint chairs prevent self harm or violence to others  ( allows the madman to settle in a low stimuli environment ) 2 hours in this case.
   The hood prevent spitting body fluids at others .  ( obvious reasons )
 
We have terrible murder rates , people disappearing ,    rapes , domestic violence ,    Home invasions etc.      >>      These are the people responsible .     Do you really want them on the streets.
 
 

Maybe if we keep explaining the above again and again, it might begin to sink in.

Apparently thinking it's a good idea to remove clothing and accessories from a person threatening self harm is an indictment on your character, rather than simply thinking it's an obvious step to take to ensure a lower risk of the person being able to kill or injure themselves. Confused
Back to Top
3blindmice View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 18105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 3blindmice Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 11:36am
Yes Macca and Abu Ghraib was a reaction to the horrors and stresses soldiers were subjected to in a dirty war against a sociopathic enemy. Even Calley's mass murder of Vietnamese villagers can be explained away if you want to take that line. Rattlesnake would be first cab off the rank in this forum but you'd probably be shouting encouragement from the sidelines - and I'm sure you know better. Such behaviour is obviously understandable to an extent, the question is should a supposedly advanced society tolerate it - particularly in the case of youth detention. 

No doubt the handlers at these institutions have difficult jobs. They are highly likely to have inadequate resources, the right characters, or the right access to outside assistance. That's where "the system" aka institutions, their "leaders" and policies, and ultimately political overseers are to be held responsible. The treatment we've seen is obviously the simplest solution for some people - including the NT Chief Minister it seems (and possibly others before him), but it's plainly NOT the only answer, and it's certainly far from the best - unless of course the aim is to create future hardened crims.
Back to Top
3blindmice View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 18105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 3blindmice Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 12:00pm
Originally posted by Rattlesnake Rattlesnake wrote:


Maybe if we keep explaining the above again and again, it might begin to sink in.

Apparently thinking it's a good idea to remove clothing and accessories from a person threatening self harm is an indictment on your character, rather than simply thinking it's an obvious step to take to ensure a lower risk of the person being able to kill or injure themselves. Confused

As a highly self-rated backyard practitioner of quaint neocon philosophy you clearly have difficulty with simple concepts but here's a tip - there are better ways of ensuring that a detention hanging doesn't occur. Using the monitoring system they have in place would be one but even that is reactionary. Smarter men than you and I - well more you - have written about the psychological damage that stripping a juvenile can do. In this case it's got as least as much to do with humiliation and exertion of power as it has to do with "care" about the inmate, although I can see how you'd arrive at the conclusion that these handlers were extremely concerned for the mental and physical health of their charges. 

While we (well some of us) might be appalled at the handlers actions here the real question for the RC is "why was it so". The answer will almost certainly be better systems, better staff, and better resources - including professional help and rehab programs.  As we've seen in the abuse RC there will always be individuals who take advantage of their positions of trust. The only way around that is transparency and to make the whole chain responsible .
Back to Top
maccamax View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 41473
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote maccamax Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 12:25pm
3 Blind Mice ..   I may remind you I was employed in that area for many, many years and handled much worse people than 4 Corners showed you.   Parramatta Criminal Psychiatric ,     the infamous ward 13 at North Ryde.
    Murderers galore who had been found not guilty on the grounds of insanity . 2 Royal Commissions showed no alternative there .        They closed them down and dumped the inmates onto society on pensions as a result of Unions and good meaning people like you. .
   Need I mention Anita Cobby ,     Daniel Morcombe , jill Meagher , Milat's victims again , plus thousands of other lives lost as a direct result.
 
    You can't change these people with verbal diarrhoea.       
Even the Senior Aboriginal people like Warren Mundine will disagree with you.
Back to Top
Rattlesnake View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 705
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rattlesnake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 12:51pm
Originally posted by 3blindmice 3blindmice wrote:

Originally posted by Rattlesnake Rattlesnake wrote:


Maybe if we keep explaining the above again and again, it might begin to sink in.

Apparently thinking it's a good idea to remove clothing and accessories from a person threatening self harm is an indictment on your character, rather than simply thinking it's an obvious step to take to ensure a lower risk of the person being able to kill or injure themselves. Confused

As a highly self-rated backyard practitioner of quaint neocon philosophy you clearly have difficulty with simple concepts but here's a tip - there are better ways of ensuring that a detention hanging doesn't occur. Using the monitoring system they have in place would be one but even that is reactionary. Smarter men than you and I - well more you - have written about the psychological damage that stripping a juvenile can do. In this case it's got as least as much to do with humiliation and exertion of power as it has to do with "care" about the inmate, although I can see how you'd arrive at the conclusion that these handlers were extremely concerned for the mental and physical health of their charges. 

While we (well some of us) might be appalled at the handlers actions here the real question for the RC is "why was it so". The answer will almost certainly be better systems, better staff, and better resources - including professional help and rehab programs.  As we've seen in the abuse RC there will always be individuals who take advantage of their positions of trust. The only way around that is transparency and to make the whole chain responsible .

The World Health Organisation states the following;

Physical Environment and Architecture;  

Most inmates commit suicide by hanging using bedding, shoelaces or clothing. A suicide-safe environment would be a cell or dormitory that has eliminated or minimized hanging points and unsupervised access to lethal materials. Actively suicidal inmates may require protective clothing or restraints. Because of the controversial nature of restraints, clear policies and procedures must be in place if they are to be used.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Sorry 3blindmice, I disagree that believing that putting somebody in protective clothing that reduces the risk of suicide is the hideous character flaw you make it out to be.

The WHO also touched on the use of restraints in the above as well. I don't believe it's a stretch to think that a drug affected person eating their mattress, threatening to snap bones in their hands etc may be actively suicidal.

I can see why there could be effects that were detrimental to mental health, but ensuring the person doesn't actually kill themselves by physically ensuring that they can't do it is also important.

I'll leave it there, as you've shown yourself to be unable to discuss this without attacking posters personally.
Back to Top
3blindmice View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 18105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 3blindmice Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 12:55pm
Off topic Macca, and your cause and effect needs some work, although I think I recall seeing a report on recidivism and the link between serious property crime and the likelihood of moving up to criminal harm. Don't hold me to that, I'd have to refresh. I'm certainly not in favour of release of offenders in many of the cases (or bail in the Meagher case) you listed even if rehab appears to have worked.

Mundine ? I'd be wary of throwing someone else on the bonfire like that. I'm unaware that he's made any statement in this particular case but he's certainly made plenty of the incarceration of indigenous youth. He's no oracle but always worth listening to.

Just checked and Mundine's statements appear to contradict you.

The chairman of the prime minister’s Indigenous advisory council, Warren Mundine, said: “We have a cultural problem within the corrective services industry and, you know, I wouldn’t be surprised if it goes further than the Northern Territory.”

He was also on Sky News saying isolation has to be done in some cases but "it's the way we do it, and  we do it more humanely."

And on 7:30: " I have not seen any evidence that locking up kids works."


Back to Top
3blindmice View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 18105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 3blindmice Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 1:11pm
Originally posted by Rattlesnake Rattlesnake wrote:


Sorry 3blindmice, I disagree that believing that putting somebody in protective clothing that reduces the risk of suicide is the hideous character flaw you make it out to be.

The WHO also touched on the use of restraints in the above as well. I don't believe it's a stretch to think that a drug affected person eating their mattress, threatening to snap bones in their hands etc may be actively suicidal.

I can see why there could be effects that were detrimental to mental health, but ensuring the person doesn't actually kill themselves by physically ensuring that they can't do it is also important.

I'll leave it there, as you've shown yourself to be unable to discuss this without attacking posters personally.

Shifting the argument might work with forelock tuggers Rattlesnake but it doesn't cut it with me. Having read some of your other rambles I'm not in the least surprised you have difficulty with the concept of basic human rights let alone the obvious mistreatment of disadvantaged youth. The protective clothing you now euphemise about presumably in your mind includes human skin?  You can try and rationalise it any way you like but it's comforting that neither the general public nor (thankfully) those in power at the Fed level agree with you. 
Back to Top
Whale View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Location: St Kilda Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 38719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Whale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 1:27pm
A lot of the kids are violent, ratbag hopeless cases no doubt, in some peoples' eyes this justifies any behaviour to restrain or punish them.

Macca if this is 1 one a scale ,what is 10 ?

And how much personal involvement and to what level have you participated in ?  Just curious
Back to Top
Rattlesnake View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 15 Nov 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 705
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Rattlesnake Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 2:01pm
Originally posted by 3blindmice 3blindmice wrote:

Originally posted by Rattlesnake Rattlesnake wrote:


Sorry 3blindmice, I disagree that believing that putting somebody in protective clothing that reduces the risk of suicide is the hideous character flaw you make it out to be.

The WHO also touched on the use of restraints in the above as well. I don't believe it's a stretch to think that a drug affected person eating their mattress, threatening to snap bones in their hands etc may be actively suicidal.

I can see why there could be effects that were detrimental to mental health, but ensuring the person doesn't actually kill themselves by physically ensuring that they can't do it is also important.

I'll leave it there, as you've shown yourself to be unable to discuss this without attacking posters personally.

Shifting the argument might work with forelock tuggers Rattlesnake but it doesn't cut it with me. Having read some of your other rambles I'm not in the least surprised you have difficulty with the concept of basic human rights let alone the obvious mistreatment of disadvantaged youth. The protective clothing you now euphemise about presumably in your mind includes human skin?  You can try and rationalise it any way you like but it's comforting that neither the general public nor (thankfully) those in power at the Fed level agree with you. 

In the footage I've seen Vollers was left with detention center / prison clothing to wear.

This is usually specialised clothing that reduces risk of self harm via hanging, strangulation etc.

I find you quiet easy to rebut you because your main technique is to attack the poster personally rather than offer anything of substance to the discussion. 

My issue is that I want to discuss the topic rather than waste my time sifting through false equivalencies, lies, and personal attacks that don't require responses.

Back to Top
maccamax View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 41473
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote maccamax Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 2:42pm
3 blind mice .  .   Warren Mundine was on Sky just days ago.          told of one young man aged 14 he met and said he was impressive .       Then stated he was in detention as a serial , random rapist.
--------------
    Whale .     I started at Bloomfield Psychiatric centre in 1952.  ( No anti psychotics those days )
 1800 inmates.  90 % of patients great , harmless and needed asylum .       The 2 danger wards were hell houses. Many very serious assaults and unmanageable at times ,    1 murder while I was there till 1965 .  2 nurses stabbed , 1 killed since ( approx. 2013 )..    Numerous models of "straight Jackets in use regularly .   For Quite a few,  full time dress was canvas ( slept on canvas rugs ) ,  various restriction jackets in operation 24/24.
 
    Customs on Sydney Waterfront  2 years .    Parramatta Psychiatric Centre ( Cumberland ) 67/ 1974.
The Criminal ( 2 wards)  Psychiatric there until they were moved to Morrisett NSW  .      Hell Houses. 
 Physical intervention required on a daily basis. 
  Director of Nursing in a Privately owned Repatriation Hospital ( psychiatric ) Burwood.    That was heaven .    Broke my Heart when it changed hands.
 Mostly WW2 Vets , ageing and shattered by their Army days .FYI.   Repat was wonderful to them.
   To the infamous ward 13 North Ryde 1985 .    ( dangerous offenders found not guilty on the grounds  of insanity )   2 murders of innocents by escapees about that time .
  Very difficult area .     
 I then had several years at the ( General )Prince Henry Hospital  Little bay ( Next to long bay Gaol)
That hospital received most aboriginal Admissions for the entire region (  down as far as the Nowra area) in the South.
Shoalhaven Hospital did house some  Aboriginal admissions.
   The indigenous people were not a major problem in my time there.
  I returned to North Ryde in early 1992 and was pensioned off ( injured ) in 1994.       As a result of an assault by a heroine crazed inmate who went beserk with a heavy deck chair . ( shattered Knee)
   Those happenings were not unusual ,    were costly by way of compensation to staff ( sick leave and payouts ) .
   Many Nurses worked around the Circuit  during time off ,     For the On call nursing services .  
 I may add whale . Sadly ,  assaults on Nurses & para- medics is now an epidemic almost everywhere.
        Young men like the 4 Corners video show,  are the  usual offenders.  
  Some areas have great difficulty getting Nurses to work in these worst areas now days and Security Staff are now an added expense for taxpayers.
 
 
Back to Top
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 2:43pm
Seems that nothing good has happened for these people in the past 50 years, and things are only getting worse.

The ABC story does not report on the problem, only on a symptom.

These 11 yo terrorists are a product of their "tribe", and they are imprinted with these antisocial characteristics long before they enter the corrective services system.

The civil libertarians have failed once again - looks like it's time to revert to the auspices of the Aboriginal Protection Act ... 
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
3blindmice View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 18105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 3blindmice Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 5:45pm
 QUOTE=Rattlesnake]
Originally posted by 3blindmice 3blindmice wrote:

Originally posted by Rattlesnake Rattlesnake wrote:


Sorry 3blindmice, I disagree that believing that putting somebody in protective clothing that reduces the risk of suicide is the hideous character flaw you make it out to be.

The WHO also touched on the use of restraints in the above as well. I don't believe it's a stretch to think that a drug affected person eating their mattress, threatening to snap bones in their hands etc may be actively suicidal.

I can see why there could be effects that were detrimental to mental health, but ensuring the person doesn't actually kill themselves by physically ensuring that they can't do it is also important.

I'll leave it there, as you've shown yourself to be unable to discuss this without attacking posters personally.

Shifting the argument might work with forelock tuggers Rattlesnake but it doesn't cut it with me. Having read some of your other rambles I'm not in the least surprised you have difficulty with the concept of basic human rights let alone the obvious mistreatment of disadvantaged youth. The protective clothing you now euphemise about presumably in your mind includes human skin?  You can try and rationalise it any way you like but it's comforting that neither the general public nor (thankfully) those in power at the Fed level agree with you. 

In the footage I've seen Vollers was left with detention center / prison clothing to wear.

This is usually specialised clothing that reduces risk of self harm via hanging, strangulation etc.

I find you quiet easy to rebut you because your main technique is to attack the poster personally rather than offer anything of substance to the discussion. 

My issue is that I want to discuss the topic rather than waste my time sifting through false equivalencies, lies, and personal attacks that don't require responses.

[/QUOTE]

Moral of the story - your failure to actually read the many available news reports of what transpired, or the formal report linked above doesn't excuse your ignorance, even if it is par for the course for your ilk. If you're going to attempt to defend something, even with obscure references to "rules" which are clearly counter-productive, certainly "explosive" and most would argue are violations of normal human standards (see the Gwynne report), then you should as a minimum have the basics correct. "Half the world" has now seen footage of Voller being forceably stripped, but somehow you managed to miss it. Too much time spent in trying to justify the unjustifiable. Your attempt to be "clever" by quoting rules is hollow.

Anyone wanting an insight into just how gross were the conditions, the negligence, incompetence, lack of proper of procedure, training and direction should peruse Gwyne's report. This apparently mirrors to some extent a 2012 report by the previous Child Commissioner Dr Howard Bath.

Quote: 

The full investigation was presented to the government in 2012, but it was never publicly released or tabled in parliament.

It details serious concerns about Mr Voller spending extended periods of time in solitary confinement and being the subject of "inappropriate and excessive force".

Dr Bath said the government was warned well before the tear gassing of six boys in 2014 that action had to be taken.

"In 2012 the occurrence of this sort of response to young people in detention was made known to the various authorities in youth justice," Dr Bath told Four Corners.

"Specific recommendations in 2012 were made about safer ways to intervene, to provide training, to provide support, supervision for the workers involved so that harm would not occur to the young people."

But the incidents continued.

Witnesses and child detainees, speaking for the first time, have told Four Corners Mr Voller was repeatedly targeted by guards inside.


I'll leave you with just one extract from the Gwynne report from one of the YJO's involved in the "riot":
YJO B told investigators: ‘The kids kept asking if they could get out and management never had any answers for them and the detainees went off and I don’t blame them, I would have too. It wouldn’t have happened if they didn’t keep them in there for so long. It is horrible, it stinks, they do the spring cleaning every Saturday but when you’ve got so many kids in there and they are all going to the toilet and they were sharing cells, it is not nice living arrangements or accommodation, I am surprised it didn’t happen sooner.’ 
Back to Top
Whale View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Location: St Kilda Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 38719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Whale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 6:15pm
Back to Top
maccamax View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 41473
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote maccamax Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 6:26pm
  It happens regularly ,   and to think  improving conditions or reducing " time out " helps anything .    It doesn't ,      take your eyes off them or believe their assurances is just a waste of time .  
  You will get let own every time and the whole cycle starts again.
 
Referring to 11 year olds is just to make the situation look worse ,    Most are much older than that & many are Institutionalised and live their  life that way
 
I note they banned the spittle hood and the restraint chair today.    What do you think is the response now when Officers get spat on , punched , kicked.   
     Bomb their brain with heavy drugs and supervise zombies.      THEN--- release them to Rob, Terrorise Rape & kill.  
        When released,   all of them should be taken in and given a home by Politicians.      
Back to Top
Go Flash Go View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 08 Mar 2007
Location: Victoria
Status: Offline
Points: 10250
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Go Flash Go Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 6:31pm
They haven't banned the burqa Thumbs Up
Back to Top
maccamax View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 41473
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote maccamax Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28 Jul 2016 at 7:45pm
Originally posted by Go Flash Go Go Flash Go wrote:

They haven't banned the burqa Thumbs Up
 
ClapClap   GOOD POINT FLASH .             or the mutilations or the support for Shari law.
 
  The ABC is a doozie for misleading the Public. 
I saw a documentary recently on the dungeons at Parramatta Psychiatric Centre and the old and dilapidated Buildings the unfortunate Patients were housed in they said.    FALSE
   The so called dungeons were closed generations before  my time (   over 80 years ago ) and the New Hospital was built in the early 1960's close to where  Westmead Hospital was to be built & Marsden Hospital for the kids. 
Back to Top
Isaac soloman View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 13 Oct 2015
Status: Offline
Points: 6085
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Isaac soloman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 8:00am
Perhaps Maccamax you stayed too long at the job, becoming cynical, instaed of helping the problem becoming part of the problem.
Having kids i know dealing with 11 year olds [even younger] and up can be tough, but up to 3 adult males to sort a "problem", wow...........
I thought i might become part of the aged care industry but after experiencing bullying/uncaring staff and crass lecturers decided to give it a miss, for my own mental health.
And then to read, almost daily, the rubbish that occurs; indifference, neglect,  etc, etc, im bloody glad i did.
Back to Top
maccamax View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 41473
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote maccamax Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 9:04am
Originally posted by Isaac soloman Isaac soloman wrote:

Perhaps Maccamax you stayed too long at the job, becoming cynical, instaed of helping the problem becoming part of the problem.
Having kids i know dealing with 11 year olds [even younger] and up can be tough, but up to 3 adult males to sort a "problem", wow...........
I thought i might become part of the aged care industry but after experiencing bullying/uncaring staff and crass lecturers decided to give it a miss, for my own mental health.
And then to read, almost daily, the rubbish that occurs; indifference, neglect,  etc, etc, im bloody glad i did.
 
       You touched on some very good points in few words Isaac.
 Workers in the areas you mention do suffer personal damage from such horrific environments.
 Your measuring the numbers of staff shown in those videos wouldn't reflect the true picture , only the finale after they had taken control of the volatile situation. 
  The staff did nothing wrong and no visible injury was evident. 
 Forget this 11 year old business , and spend some time researching the history of the offenders before and since those videos were taken.
  I am aware my workplace choice wasn't in my best interests over time but the Systems we talk about are most certainly not managed in the best interests of Society.      Thousands have lost their lives over the years as a result and that will continue long into the future.
    This waste of resources on Royal Commissions will achieve nothing and only increase the risks to the community ,     For the very reason that Staff we rely on  to handle the dangers will be reluctant to choose what is the best options.
  You admit you couldn't handle the unsatisfactory mix of aged care and I do understand that, but let me assure you ,   The areas of criminal Psychosis are a far different and more draining experience on the staff than aged care facilities.
Back to Top
thesherrif View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 15 Jun 2016
Location: Launceston
Status: Offline
Points: 348
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote thesherrif Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 10:08am
Back to Top
acacia alba View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Location: Hunter Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 41536
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote acacia alba Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 10:57am
You see this so often.  Everyone jumps up and down at the way staff act or react , but very few of these that are jumping up and down would be prepared to take on the job.
And the worse the offenders become, the less you will get that will do the job.
Or at the very least, you will get the dregs doing it, and then what ??  Things will become even worse than before.
Its like Foster Care for children.  I know quite a few who loved doing it , back say 20 years ago.  Now they just cant put themselves thru it, because of the laws , to uphold the rights, of the dead beat, abusive, druggie parents, who just as the Fosters get the child sorted and safe and happy, back come the parents into the kid,s life and ruin all the good work , and the cycle starts all over again.
Too many rights for offenders and not enough for victims.  
I was on the fence over that bit of film that started this thread, but having seen more behind the scenes info and things that were not shown or told, that have since come to light, I cant imagine why anyone would choose to work with kids and young people like those .   And I bet their pay is miserable , too.
I bet there are not many here who would take on a job like that . 

animals before people.
Back to Top
3blindmice View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 18105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 3blindmice Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 10:59am
Originally posted by maccamax maccamax wrote:

  It happens regularly ,   and to think  improving conditions or reducing " time out " helps anything .    It doesn't ,      take your eyes off them or believe their assurances is just a waste of time .  
  You will get let own every time and the whole cycle starts again.
 
Referring to 11 year olds is just to make the situation look worse ,    Most are much older than that & many are Institutionalised and live their  life that way
 
I note they banned the spittle hood and the restraint chair today.    What do you think is the response now when Officers get spat on , punched , kicked.   
     Bomb their brain with heavy drugs and supervise zombies.      THEN--- release them to Rob, Terrorise Rape & kill.  
        When released,   all of them should be taken in and given a home by Politicians.      

Read the report Macca - none of the kids had attempted to spit at handlers. The testimony of the YJOs is very illuminating on a whole range of points. I'll reserve final judgement but it does appear that people further up the line are far more deserving of a good kicking. 

Just as a final note for apologists who claim that officers were merely acting to protect Voller from himself when three of them stripped him. Seems at odds with the fact that one of them carried in and left some white material in the cell - clearly evident in the video.
Back to Top
Whale View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 01 Jun 2009
Location: St Kilda Beach
Status: Offline
Points: 38719
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (1) Thanks(1)   Quote Whale Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 11:07am
It is human nature to become desensitised, bitter in the face of difficult conditions, feel invincible when in a position of some authority, overstep reasonable standards when in control of others.

Sure it is a rotten , difficult job but  there must be some scrutiny and control when officers overstep the mark, they cannot be allowed free rein as some believe, extrapolating some horrible incidents of inmate behaviour to licence to treat them all as you want.


And yes it is an awful job, I would not do it if they paid me LOL
Back to Top
acacia alba View Drop Down
Champion
Champion
Avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Location: Hunter Valley
Status: Offline
Points: 41536
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote acacia alba Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 11:10am
One has to look at the people who were supposed to be in charge ,  before unloading on blokes doing a difficult job.  
animals before people.
Back to Top
maccamax View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 41473
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote maccamax Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 11:18am
Originally posted by 3blindmice 3blindmice wrote:

Originally posted by maccamax maccamax wrote:

  It happens regularly ,   and to think  improving conditions or reducing " time out " helps anything .    It doesn't ,      take your eyes off them or believe their assurances is just a waste of time .  
  You will get let own every time and the whole cycle starts again.
 
Referring to 11 year olds is just to make the situation look worse ,    Most are much older than that & many are Institutionalised and live their  life that way
 
I note they banned the spittle hood and the restraint chair today.    What do you think is the response now when Officers get spat on , punched , kicked.   
     Bomb their brain with heavy drugs and supervise zombies.      THEN--- release them to Rob, Terrorise Rape & kill.  
        When released,   all of them should be taken in and given a home by Politicians.      

Read the report Macca - none of the kids had attempted to spit at handlers. The testimony of the YJOs is very illuminating on a whole range of points. I'll reserve final judgement but it does appear that people further up the line are far more deserving of a good kicking. 

Just as a final note for apologists who claim that officers were merely acting to protect Voller from himself when three of them stripped him. Seems at odds with the fact that one of them carried in and left some white material in the cell - clearly evident in the video.
 
  We must be reading different evidence 3BM.       That boy has an horrendous record both then and since .          The Officers were very gentle in securing in the restraint chair ( for 2 Hours )
   Our Opinions won't change anything , except we may realise what a difficult task it is to try and reduce the terrible price the community pays.
    If you or anyone else think you have a way to change / improve Dylan Voller  ( good luck )
 He fits the profile of  a murder going somewhere to happen.
Back to Top
maccamax View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 18 Jun 2010
Status: Offline
Points: 41473
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote maccamax Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 11:40am
[QUOTE=acacia alba]You see this so often.  Everyone jumps up and down at the way staff act or react , but very few of these that are jumping up and down would be prepared to take on the job.
And the worse the offenders become, the less you will get that will do the job.
Or at the very least, you will get the dregs doing it, and then what ??  Things will become even worse than before.
Its like Foster Care for children.  I know quite a few who loved doing it , back say 20 years ago.  Now they just cant put themselves thru it, because of the laws , to uphold the rights, of the dead beat, abusive, druggie parents, who just as the Fosters get the child sorted and safe and happy, back come the parents into the kid,s life and ruin all the good work , and the cycle starts all over again.
Too many rights for offenders and not enough for victims.  
I was on the fence over that bit of film that started this thread, but having seen more behind the scenes info and things that were not shown or told, that have since come to light, I cant imagine why anyone would choose to work with kids and young people like those .   And I bet their pay is miserable , too.
I bet there are not many here who would take on a job like that . 
--------------
 
How true AA.            . Nice to see a considered comment.
 
   If we gave some thought to "what" is walking around out there in some areas .         >   many would install razor wire security around our house and not venture out.
     Considering at least 250 of us will be murdered in the next 12 months & just as many disappear without trace .
     That will increase when they close these detention centres.   Police will solve about 50% of the killings.

Back to Top
Gay3 View Drop Down
Moderator Group
Moderator Group


Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Location: Miners Rest
Status: Offline
Points: 52012
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Gay3 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 12:59pm
macca & a few others will appreciate this opinion piece Smile

The ABC has misled the public about this ‘torture’

Andrew Bolt Daily Telegraph Friday, July 29, 2016 (8:41am)

The ABC’s presentation of this incident is looking more suspicious by the day.

Here is how Four Corners presenter Sarah Ferguson described the above scene - of Dylan Voller being strapped to a restraint chair:

The image you have just seen isn’t from Guantanamo bay.... or Abu Ghraib.. but Australia in 2015… A boy, hooded, shackled, strapped to a chair and left alone. It is barbaric.

This is juvenile justice in the Northern Territory, a system that punishes troubled children instead of rehabilitating them

As I said yesterday:

No reason was given for what was presented as gratuitous torture....

But the ABC omitted the context that explains why he was restrained. Voller has been in and out of detention centres since he was 11. A court was told he’d attacked his mother and had committed more than 50 offences so far, many violent.

He’d got on ice, tried to run down a policeman and joined in a pack attack that left a victim unconscious. He’d spat at detention centre staff hundreds of times and before he was strapped into that chair, footage not aired by the ABC shows the guards telling Voller he’d been chewing on his mattress and had “unfortunately ... put yourself in here by going at risk”.

Voller replies: “I’m going to break my hand anyway ... I’ll snap my bone through my skin.” The guard then says Voller must then be strapped to a restraint chair to help him “keep chilling out”. The hood is actually a mesh to stop him spitting on guards.

There may well be a better way to stop a strong young man from spitting on staff and harming himself. But to simply present this as torture of an essentially harmless boy is misleading and inflammatory.

But this is all that Four Corners said about Voller’s record:

A troubled boy with behavioural problems, Dylan Voller has been in and out of juvenile detention since he was 11 years old.

For car theft, robberies and, more recently, assault. He’s one of the Northern Territory’s most notorious young offenders.

But he himself is a victim and there’s a lot the public doesn’t know about the plight of Dylan Voller.

Here are more details Four Corners refused to report - perhaps for fear that the context might moderate the outrage it wanted to incite:

Voller’s spree began in Alice Spring’s iconic Todd Street, where he and the two other young men tried to rob a man walking to work.

A court later heard that Voller, then a slightly built teen, ran bare-chested at the man, yelling “you fat white racist dog. You yelled at us”.

The three teens took the man’s wallet, knocked him to the pavement and kicked him in the ribs.

Still high on drugs the following day, the boys ambushed Luke McIntyre near a store where the 17-year-old was trying to buy cigarettes.

Voller struck him with a mop handle, punched him in the face and stole his wallet. Mr McIntyre was bashed unconscious, then his three assailants fled in a Holden Commodore.

Voller was behind the wheel and tried to run down a “terrified” Constable Gerard Reardon who had ordered the trio to stop.

But the ABC has instead deployed its massive power to portray Voller as an innocent child victim of torture. Here is how one ABC report pictured the strapping teen:
image

I think Four Corners has fundamentally misrepresented Voller as a mere “boy” and a “victim”, and misrepresented the restraint of this violent and potentially self-harming teenager as torture.

Wisdom has been chasing me but I've always outrun it!
Back to Top
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 1:16pm
Did I hear that they have banned use of the hood and the restraint chair as a knee jerk reaction to this?

Voller will be treated like a Rock Star when he is next incarcerated ... which will just be a matter of time ...
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
Dr E View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 05 Feb 2013
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Points: 28563
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Dr E Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 1:18pm
Good luck controlling them when the CS Officers quote OH & S concerns, down tools and refuse to work under those conditions ...
In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!
Back to Top
3blindmice View Drop Down
Champion
Champion


Joined: 22 Oct 2012
Status: Offline
Points: 18105
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote 3blindmice Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29 Jul 2016 at 1:35pm
Originally posted by acacia alba acacia alba wrote:

One has to look at the people who were supposed to be in charge ,  before unloading on blokes doing a difficult job.  

Yes AA and the reports and history as outlined publicly would suggest that while the YJOs had a role in the whole saga, theirs was not the major fault. The whole system broke down due to a complete lack of care from the top - possibly including the judiciary, but at the very least, the government of the day and its institutional managers.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 20>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.05
Copyright ©2001-2022 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.203 seconds.