LNP government.

Bill Shorten, Mark Latham mark II .

No?

Isaac soloman wrote: No? Friends, at the time, were quite happy to hand out how to vote cards for him. How many here did the same?

Handing out how to vote cards is your big bit of proof they are similar? Sorry to tell you that that’s what anyone in the party would be doing.

LOL,...guilty your honour on all counts.

ExceedAndExcel wrote: Isaac soloman wrote: Bill Shorten, Mark Latham mark II . Whale, pt etc would have thought ML ok leading into that election. Did you blokes actually vote for Mark? You know, the much maligned Mark... How many times has Bill Shorten snapped the arm of a taxi driver? The country dodged a bullet with that guy! Can’t see much similarity between the two.

She was a good sort

Carioca wrote: Passing Through wrote: Our neighbor has a mulberry tree. Hard to deny when you are purple from head to toe. When I got caught I told him it's just the leaves for my silk worms I want .

Keep laying Labor maxie, 1.80 is closer to the right odds, but dont get too aroused by the SloMo scent as he looms and forget to green out.

And #watergate.

I dont think many people will sharpen their pencils and do their own calculations on Labor's costings and only 3 people watch Sky, so no cut through on that

Passing Through wrote: I dont think many people will sharpen their pencils and do their own calculations on Labor's costings and only 3 people watch Sky, so no cut through on that If people did understand the numbers they would definitely boot the LNP. With inflation dropping to probably reflect soft real GDP, well below the medium term numbers the Libs use in their heroic budget numbers, chronic under employment stagnant wages growth and falling house prices, and being the second highest taxing govt in our history(after Howard/Costello)yet claiming adding $275 B to govt debt is great management.

They know they are toast so what they have done is put together a budget full of complete nonsense but which will allow them to point the finger at Labor if/when then recession that they have set us up for occurs.

ExceedAndExcel wrote: maccamax wrote: Passing Through wrote: Keep laying Labor maxie, 1.80 is closer to the right odds, but dont get too aroused by the SloMo scent as he looms and forget to green out. I greened out earlier and nice result but the drift has stopped , recent days.        . That's "get up " & E&E me thinks.    As you say , The price does appear to be big unders with the hurdles facing "Bill" re costing.       __   he still wins in golden point. No not me. I have been out of action the last week or so with a couple of big tennis tournaments taking priority. Back in on Monday.

   That was a "Yoke Yoyce."----- You said out @ $1.25 so I ran before you swallowed me.
I'll need the funds for the celebration Party when the LNP save Australia from Bonking Billy.

I think many people who are not politically inclined, and dont follow it or know much about it, the way you fellas do, just simply dont like Shorten.   Just listening to general chit chat at the RSL lunch yesterday no one seemed to have a good word to say about him.  It was quite a cross section of ages and sexes, as it was veterans and families, and others who attended the service. I was surprised how many of the younger birgade didnt really have much interest in the ploiticians either when the sunject came up .  Maybe the city youth are gung ho, but the youth here seemed to be more engaged in just getting their life on track. Just a few people who were a bit cluey led me to believe there will be a big swing, in the bush,  against both major parties .  But no one could say they liked Shorten.  I was helping to serve up and clear up so wasnt in the conversation.  Just listening in

Passing Through wrote:

This alone tells you what a poor job they have done managing the economy. Remember when Questions told us 6 years that the next move was up?

Bogan thug beating up a cameraman stopping the thug from harassing a female journalist at a Fraser Anning public event. What a shock.