Folau - Higgins/Lehrmann P193

That it would Gay. 

oneonesit wrote: Your not serious are you PT. How is he any worse than the stuff we all say on here on a daily basis to upset each other ? The only difference is that he says it with good intentions (as he perceives it) & bases it on biblical text- unlike most of us who talk out of our clacker & hope to maim. In both cases - if those that are offended are silly enough to log onto TBV OR his private social media sites then they cant complain achieving that outcome. Precious to the extreme. Society needs to lighten up a take a giant step from the left to the middle on stuff like this.

So much cluelessness to unpack in this post it’s hard to know where to begin.

Of course that’s not the only difference at all. Trying to equate a bunch of nobodies on TBV to a known public figure is just laughable. If Folau signed up here under a pseudonym like everyone else and said the same thing it would not matter because no one would know and no one would be able to link it to him or the game of rugby. You see that little blue tick next to his name? That means it’s him. And the fact that he’s a public figure (formerly) employed by a highly visible sporting entity means everything he says reflects on the game of rugby.

Private social media account? I didn’t think anyone would still be stupid enough to try that one on. If it was private you wouldnt be able to see his posts. It’s a public profile brains.

oneonesit wrote: Simple answer Whale - don't come back to the computer.Or if you cant do that - just don't click on the Folau thread - you wont get upset then . I'd give the some advice to others as well - if you think Izzy's social media posts might offend don't visit. Easy as 1,2,3.

Wouldn't have a clue. However its got to have at least as much validity as random TBV members giving their thoughts. The articles there to be read or not to be - no different to this comment of mine or one of your 1000's in the Trump thread. Whats your point PT ?

Took me 2 seconds to find it on the article - Zac Rayson - Fox sports journalist.

Ok - but its never worried me. Just another opinion. Not sure what your getting at though - are you suggesting Fox are trying to undermine their partner RA ?

Just checked the last 7 articles i have posted & only 1 has not got the journalists name

oneonesit wrote: Just checked the last 7 articles i have posted & only 1 has not got the journalists name

bit like the Orange Obstructor tearing up the inquiry results and declaring himself innocent?

Sorry paywalled.

What do the religious want to do that they are being stopped from doing? They are snowflakes aren't they? That's what it looks like to me

For starters - not being able to not express their religious beliefs in order to make a living playing Rugby.

oneonesit wrote: For starters - not being able to not express their religious beliefs in order to make a living playing Rugby.

They want a law allowing them to damage the business they work for without getting sacked? Praise be.

Tlazolteotl wrote: What do the religious want to do that they are being stopped from doing? They are snowflakes aren't they? That's what it looks like to me

Um...