I want the Tigers to lose just to wipe that smirk of Jack Riewoldts face, he gelatis me up the wall

Wrong decision by the MRP

What was the difference between Cotchins hit and the Dangerfield ban>

It's criminal. Cotchin should be fined $50,000 and hit with a 9 week ban.

"If flags were awarded based on pedigree, just hand it to the Giants now!

However, they will not show up when the finals blow torch is applied to their soft underbelly, they have no soul, no support base, and they are down hill skiers. Leon Cameron is no Hugh Bowman either!"

Dr E wrote:

They would tear AFL HQ down if anyone was to miss a GF based on an incident in a prelim ... just doesn't happen! Wink

Should be a great game, I think the supporters are fairly even in the feral/bogan stakes.

Adelaide are the favourites, but like the Swans last year, they need to come to the MCG and hope that the Umpires can overcome the emotion of the moment, and not get caught up in the pro- Tigers Cinderella Story.

... assuming that there are no major outs, Crows by less than a goal, with Jack R kicking a point from a set shot after the siren. Cry

Well, at least I got a couple of things right this season! LOL

Always remember this one ... lucky he had such a pristine record! Wink

Hall cleared to play in grand final

September 20, 2005 - 8:56PM

http://www.smh.com.au/news/afl/hall-cleared-to-play-in-grand-final/2005/09/20/1126982057281.html

In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!

Different rules for finals ... always has been.

In reference to every post in the Trump thread ... "There may have been a tiny bit of license taken there" ... Ok, Thanks for the "heads up" PT!

Dangerfield gets suspended and can't win the Brownlow. Fair enough, but finishes 2nd, three votes behind a most worthy winner.

However in the round after resuming from his suspension in Round 20-odd Dangerfield has around 35 touches, 10 clearances, 10 tackles and two goals in a totally dominant performance. And doesn't get the three votes, let alone two, or even one.

So there's four scenarios imo:

a. the umpires were instructed not to give him votes to avoid embarassment should he otherwise top the voting for the coveted medal;

b. the umpires themselves for whatever reason themselves decided not to award him votes;

c. those same umpires were simply incompetent; or

d. three other players were considered better on the day.

Where's your money?

UBET promo offered yesterday was Adelaide 16+ @$3. Have abused it as usual.

Do I hear an early CROW ?

Tigers on fire, should go on with it ... Dusty was way overs for Coleman! Wink

LMFAO ...

Gai just had one in at Kembla called "Grand Finalist", starts 2's on in field of five, leads at all cost, "gives up meekly in the straight" runs 3rd - NTD.

"an each way chance"? LOL

A total carve up. Absolute dud of a finals series. Every game a hammering.

Last year's flag winner (Western Bulldogs ?) was the under-dog as well. Today's game looked all over, well before the hooter, too.

Magnolian Khan wrote:

ExceedAndExcel wrote:

A total carve up. Absolute dud of a finals series. Every game a hammering.

We did have a cracking draw though, and it was even better because the scummy Port Power ended up losing

Yeh that's true, there was one good game out of the 9 played.

A dud game for the losers, perhaps.

I am certainly a neutral, but the object of the game is to win. You don't win by putting on an attractive spectacle, but finish behind on the scoreboard.

I don't think you were a "neutral", judge !

AFL 2017

Hall cleared to play in grand final